You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
23

[–] deathsquad 1 point 23 points (+24|-1) ago 

They would have more traction if they called it replacement rather than genocide. Genocide sounds hysterical and plays into stereotypes. Technically it is a genocide according to the Geneva convention, but not by the layperson definition.

0
6

[–] fusir 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yeah, replacement is better because in the minds of the liberals it may not even be bad, so they may even adopt the language, at which point we can cite the Geneva convention. We'll have their own words admitting that they are violating international convention. It will also be helpful in seeking remedies in the future when their language illustrates they knew what they were doing, which may include executions, dedicated land and internationally supported forced emigration that goes with it, and generally the things you would expect from genocide trails.

0
7

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Honestly leftists don't give a shit about either one as long as it's white people being killed off one way or another.

0
1

[–] SeriousNiggerFaggot 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Agreed, and what is a "warning west"?

0
1

[–] GasTheYikes 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I think he means a High vis, safety vest

1
1

[–] vonbacon 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Fuck your optics this is war man up faggot

0
0

[–] jbo5112 ago 

With information warfare, you need to market your ideas properly.