You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
3

[–] Nukethenarrative 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

You're taking like you're a Jew.

5
-4

[–] midnightblue1335 5 points -4 points (+1|-5) ago 

So you're telling me that if all of the jews on earth suddenly turned into dust, everything would be just peachy? Problem solved?

Bullshit. We'd still be surrounded and swamped by masses of shit-colored bodies grasping for everything our ancestors have built for us. They're a problem that will need to be addressed, probably before their masters. The shitskins are the sword, the jews the wielder. Ultimately we will need to disarm or knock the sword out of the way in order to obtain victory.

But calling the shitskin hordes a "sword" doesn't work, because swords can't act on their own. Shitskin hordes are acting on their own, under the direction of (((them))). Without (((them))), they're still shitskin monsters, destroying everything near them.

1
2

[–] Mittermeyer 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Without the jews, Whites would be able to fight back and take control of our nations. With the jews still in control we are unable to fight back. You are asking that we ignore the bigger enemy for the smaller enemy places here by the bigger enemy. You also ignore the bigger enemy will stop you from fighting effectively against said smaller enemy. You can't even attempt to formulate a plan past saying we should ignore the jews and go after some random shitskins first, while the jews control the media which is absolutely retarded. Your train of thought starts with "how do I get them to not go after jews" rather than how to win and deal with the shitskins effectively.

1
-1

[–] LoveRight 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

That's a shitty analogy because a sword can't do anything on its own, and a skilled swordsman is still a competent fighter, even without his sword.