You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Nukethenarrative 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Jews are FAR more dangerous than Muslims. Just like the person holding the gun is more dangerous then the gun by itself.

Without Jews we'll be readily able to deal with Muslims.

2
-2

[–] midnightblue1335 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

The person holding the gun is certainly more dangerous than the gun by itself.

But you still have to deal with the gun while he's wielding it. Unless you get the drop on him, he's going to get shots off on you. We're far passed the point where we could "get the drop" on our (((enemies))). They've got us at gunpoint, from almost all angles. To ignore the gun in this circumstance is suicide.

I'm baffled by how daft the responses to this notion are. I can keep churning out analogies or even using your own like this until you all grasp what I'm saying- WHILE THE JEW IS THE ULTIMATE ENEMY, THIS DOES NOT MAKE THE OTHER SHITSKINS ANY LESS OUR ENEMIES. Right now, we're up to our necks in shitskins- how can we possibly begin to address the jew from this position? We can't. We need to better our position first. That might mean removing some obstacles, or slipping around them at an opportune moment.

0
1

[–] Nukethenarrative 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"up to our neck"?

How?