You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
9

[–] midnightblue1335 2 points 9 points (+11|-2) ago 

This doesn't mean that muslims are any less dangerous.

It makes them more dangerous since they've been so effectively weaponized against us.

Hmm... ever play Resident Evil? In those games, the shadowy evil corporation makes biological weapons- monstrous creatures, using viruses and other nonsense.

In real life, the shadowy evil kikes made a biological weapon out of the shitskins of the world. The jew convinced the shitskins that they are entitled to everything White people have ever created or owned. Then they are set loose upon the unsuspecting White populations of the world.

Look at a muslim or shitskin as a vicious dog whose handler just sicked it on you. Yes, the handler needs to be dealt with... but first you have to deal with this vicious, savage hunk of fur and teeth and claws. Once you've addressed the immediate danger and disposed of the most pressing threat, you can address the cause of the problem- the handler.

The jews have successfully created a massive problem for the White world. Every day that goes by without retaliation, it's going to be harder to fight our way out of this. Even if every single jew on earth suddenly vanished into thin air forever, we'd still be left with the mess they created. We'd still have to fight to clean the shit out of everything our ancestors died to build for us.

0
3

[–] zxcvbnasdf 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The jews have successfully created a massive problem for the White world

Yes, and that problem is Jews. That problem is ideological subversion through the infestation of our institutions. They are like AIDS, reducing the immune system. Whether it's spics or muslims or nihilists, the host is compromised due to the kike infestation. Trying to treat the symptom is a losing battle. Until the host is cleansed of the AIDS of Jews, nothing will change.

You're just wrong.

1
1

[–] midnightblue1335 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Trying to treat the symptom is a losing battle.

If the symptom is literally going to kill you before you can address the cause, what's the point?

If someone sets your house on fire, do you kill him before you evacuate/put out the fire? Or do you address the immediate danger of the fire he started, and then go after him?

This is really simple, I'm not sure how you don't grasp this.

0
1

[–] Nukethenarrative 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Jews are FAR more dangerous than Muslims. Just like the person holding the gun is more dangerous then the gun by itself.

Without Jews we'll be readily able to deal with Muslims.

2
-2

[–] midnightblue1335 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

The person holding the gun is certainly more dangerous than the gun by itself.

But you still have to deal with the gun while he's wielding it. Unless you get the drop on him, he's going to get shots off on you. We're far passed the point where we could "get the drop" on our (((enemies))). They've got us at gunpoint, from almost all angles. To ignore the gun in this circumstance is suicide.

I'm baffled by how daft the responses to this notion are. I can keep churning out analogies or even using your own like this until you all grasp what I'm saying- WHILE THE JEW IS THE ULTIMATE ENEMY, THIS DOES NOT MAKE THE OTHER SHITSKINS ANY LESS OUR ENEMIES. Right now, we're up to our necks in shitskins- how can we possibly begin to address the jew from this position? We can't. We need to better our position first. That might mean removing some obstacles, or slipping around them at an opportune moment.

0
0

[–] v ago 

Before you can deal with the symptom (muslims), you need to get rid of the disaease (jews).

0
0

[–] midnightblue1335 ago 

You need to stop the bleeding (the explosion of non-White population growth in White countries), so that you're strong enough to get the tools or assistance to stitch up your wound (jews) before you bleed out.

You need to get passed the pawns in order to reach the king. Can I possibly simplify this any further?