This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Horrux ago (edited ago)
Well this isn't about what YOU or I consider to be this or that. It's about WHAT WORDS MEAN. You can't change the meaning of a word and then use it seriously.
As such, ANY kind of regulation of business or capitalism that seeks to curtail inequity IS A SOCIALIST POLICY. <--- PERIOD! That's what it means!
Does it mean "it's a purely socialist country"? Well no, obviously. It's like the people in the USA have been brainwashed that "socialism = bad" so any mention of "socialist" seems to mean to them "EXTREME ABSOLUTE FANATICAL SOCIALISM". Black or white but grey doesn't exist.
[–] lettersofmarque [S] ago
But you have THE correct definition? Is Venezuela incorrect in self describing itself as socialist?
[–] Horrux ago
It's not what I have. There are many billions of people on this planet and the VAST MAJORITY of them recognize "socialism" to mean precisely what I say it does. Not because I say it, but because that's what IT IS. For example:
https://philosophyterms.com/socialism/
I did not make that site. I am no expert on Venezuela, but I understand you are trying to tie in heavy political crap into this conversation which has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with Venezuela, which is in the position it's in for NUMEROUS reasons and factors, the most important of which is: OIL.
[–] Horrux ago
To further clarify, most European countries have capitalist economies with socialist governance. And it's a great balance!
On the one hand, companies do their best to make products, compete and profit. Within regulations. But there is huge potential for abuse and growing iniquity.
On the other hand, you have a government that (theoretically) is looking after the needs of the population at large and, through taxation (which is theft either way, but let's not digress), regulation and social programs, balances out the tendency of capitalism to steal all the wealth created and put it in the pockets of a select few.
For decades, this has worked perfectly in most of Europe, Canada, and many other nations. However, as we all know, (((they))) seek to destroy us and infiltrated themselves everywhere, and now governments are the puppets of the super-rich, which (((they))) control, and as such, this system has broken down.
For many decades, life was better in most every country built on this capitalist / moderate socialism model than those adopting anything else.
[–] lettersofmarque [S] ago
I have no beef with regulated capitalism, but many people do much much worse in the name of socialism and call themselves socialist as such. Maybe you should tell them they are using that word incorrectly.