You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
2

[–] TheTrigger 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

It would work if they didn't abuse nepotistic powers and keep all that wealth amongst themselves, instead of reinvesting it in the economy like they were supposed to; instead opting to consolidate their wealth to previously-laughable highs.

European royalty enjoyed 150 years ago

Moral relativism is for faggots. What about the wealth and prosperity which has been stolen from us, and redistributed in tyrannical ways? We could be a space-faring species, no longer burdened by poverty or mother nature, herself— no longer bound to this muddy grave; but power-hungry despots ruin it for everyone. They create systems of power that strengthen only few, at the expense of everyone else— whipped-up by laziness and fear. Spurred by hatred instigated by angry shadow puppets.

Humanity has had plenty of governmental systems which have worked, almost miraculously well, in the past. We deny ourselves these societal structures because of learned helplessness; or maybe simply rampant stupidity. Who knows.

1
5

[–] irelandLost 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

I’m not certain what you think moral relativism means, but it’s not what it means. Blaming corruption on supply side economics is stupid; corruption is just a feature of any system which involves corruptible humans, which is all humans. Fact is supply side economics has resulted in advances in the living conditions of people in the west that would previously have been considered fantastical, leaving a common man today in a western country living better than royalty lived 150 years ago. So how has this system failed?

0
0

[–] Horrux ago 

Dude, you are on POINT! I couldn't agree more. But the muritards around here have no clue how economics work.

National Socialism is OBVIOUSLY the best system. Therefore, the sheeple are brainwashed to think it's EVIL. LAWL.