You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
-1

[–] edistojim 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Yeah, I did actually read it. Its the same shit over and over with these people, they are responsible for nothing. She is head of the State Dept right? And she does the same thing one of her employees is doing? Come on……..she knew ti was wrong and she kept doing it? She may not of told him to use the email but she evidently knew it was wrong or she wouldn't of admonished him. You are splitting hairs. Hillary is a serial liar.

0
0

[–] TalkingAnimal ago 

SHE didn't admonish him.

You either didn't read the article, or you lack basic reading comprehension. There's no point in trying to convince you, because you believe she was wrong on this issue because you don't trust her in general. It's entirely possible that this article is bullshit and the arguments against her on this issue are bogus while she's still a terrible untrustworthy person, but you're not open to that possibility, so why even bother talking to you?

Lord, I hope you're never on a jury.

0
0

[–] edistojim ago 

"untrustworthy person"?

Yeah, I sorta agree with that. At the very least she is head of the State Dept, and had not one clue about what was going on in the very same Dept she was supposed to be running? Its entirely possible that she is not lying , but not likely, she is a proven liar that has a track record to prove it.

My reading comprehension is fine, you may need to reread the article yourself.

I've sat on more than one jury including a Federal Jury, I'd like to think I'm fair and impartial but when the one thats being tried for murder is holding a smoking gun with their finger on the trigger and its not the first time they've been charged, I tend to be a little skeptical about their innocence. I'm human.