You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] kdragon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Because if you actually cared about this subject and the ideas behind it, you would commit to the work. You are the one that came here and posted this topic, opening the dialogue.

If you don't want to lead the effort or put any real verifiable work behind your ideas, and instead trick others into doing it for you, it makes it easy to dismiss you as one of (((those))) people.

[–] [deleted] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] kdragon 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

You are being very defensive about something as simple as due dilligence. I wasn't even accusing you of anything, I was offering my thoughts on how you could setup a more conclusive experiment. I'm very skeptical of your intentions at this point, and I'm leaving my comments here as an example for others to see what can happen when even constructive criticism is used to dig beneath the surface of a superfluous idea. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are not a deliberate shill, but your own words at this point show clear signs of being possessed by this idea, if this is your kind of reaction. And I'm clearly being nicer to you than other goats.