This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] CanIHazPhD ago
Diminishing returns is the explanation. It happens in all industries. I already gave you some good examples on why it's easier to exploit resources at first. I recommend you think on those again. This also explains why modern economies can't make this growths in production. Just think why the gold rush started and stopped and even you should realize it. The threshold is not a magic number, but it's easy to see, the same threshold that separates a growing economy from a booming one.
The africans did got most if not all their low hanging fruit, it happened during colonialism.
It's funny you have a low opinion of well formed arguments that have countered every single one of your points. but that's not here nor there.
Now, for a change of pace let's see you explain why, barring a minuscule number of exceptions (which can be and have been easily explained) sustained deflation has lead to recession in all modern economies. I'll await your answer.
[–] ForTheUltimate ago
I already answered before.
[–] CanIHazPhD ago
No, you didn't. This is your supposed explanation on why deflation would lead to a better allocation of resources (and a false one at that).
I'm asking you to explain the historical reality that, save for very particular exceptions (that can be explained by secondary factors), deflation has lead to loss of growth, recessions and crashes throughout modern economical history. But you can't right? That's why you tried that it about intervention at the end, that makes no sense at all.