This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ardvarcus ago (edited ago)
You make a good point. Liberalism, in the modern sense of the term, only works as long as there is a strong, healthy conservative society to attack and mock and degrade. Under those conditions, the liberal can tell himself that he is the daring rebel, fighting against the forces of restriction and conformity. This is, of course, a lie. The first thing the liberal does when he gains power is impose his views on everyone else by force. Once traditional society has been completely broken down by liberals, who have nothing to put in its place, everything falls apart and liberals are scattered in confusion as anarchy reigns.
[–] Charilko ago
Liberalism is the act of change for the sake of change; an endless revolution that has no set endpoint, no final goals, no solution. This is why those aging liberal Boomer cucks who whine about how much more “reasonable” they were are so irritating. They thought they could stop the social change at a certain point. They thought it would only go as far as they could see.
Wrong.
We have drag queens reading books to kids in libraries because the revolution must continue. Doesn’t even really matter why. It goes on because it must.
What is there to rebel against? Nothing but a functional society. So society dies and is replaced with nothing because there was never a goal to begin with.