This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Pattern_Blind 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Actually making banking a public utility like the Post Office is a great idea. Doesn’t mean it has to be the Post Office but this is actually a good idea. That would do two things, One, help break up jewish monopoly banking infrastructure, especially in credit card issuers. Two, make it illegal for kikes to ban people who name the kike from banking services.
It doesn’t have to be the only bank in town, but a government ran bank that isn’t able to discriminate based on political views is a good thing for everyone.
The reason the post office is loosing money is because it hires lots of people and does a service as cheaply as possible for a growing US population. You can’t add millions of new people and addresses a year and hand deliver them mail with out having rising costs. Oh and add in a inflationary money supply. Costs always go up and this sounds like a miss budgeting issue
No just go on with Ocosia said it, so it must be bad, theirs a turd in the punch bowl now and we can’t discuss this issue or move forward. Or help those white nationalists get banking...
[–] CulturalImperialist 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
The post office doesn't actually lose money. A few years back Congress passed a law requiing them to prefund retirements at 100%. That new line item is over 5 billion a year. Meanwhile since this is prefunding the money is going into the general treasury and the treasury just owes the Post Office that money. That money could be their capital for banking.
[–] RoundWheel 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Bingo. The USPO is the only entity in the US which is run like this. A large part of this scam was so their federal land would be sold off cheap to friends of Congress.
The USPO does not lose money. They did, however, make a bad deal with Amazon which loses money. It's just that everyone (USPO customers) are now paying for Amazon delivery.
[–] mostlyfriendly 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
... and exactly who do you think would be running this new bank? It would be the exact same people, but now they have the power of the gov't enforcement behind them. (More than they already have.)
... and, you don't think they will ban people / organizations they don't like? No different than the IRS 'banning' conservative political groups they don't like, etc.
.... and, you don't think so called 'political extremist' wouldn't be the first to be banned?
IMHO, it would be foolish to give any more power to the government.