You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
-1

[–] flyawayhigh 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

So, let's take a look at your logic, Mr.Post Hoc Rationalization. :D

Bernie should be held to a special legal standard but others should not be held to it. The rules don't apply to everybody -- only to Bernie -- conveniently to the disadvantage both his campaign and the proposed rule itself.

Bernie = Bernie's legal standard

But then, Bernie should not be held to the very standard he supports -- a phased-in increase.

Bernie != Bernie's standard

These two positions cannot occupy the same space. They are mutually exclusive. Logic fails.