You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] SmackNotes 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Just imagine if they had actually fought back. 6 million is a large force, even if unarmed. Also, what makes that "6 million" any more of a loss than say the, 15-20 million Chinese deaths or the 6 million Poles or the 20-30 million Russians? People that actually fought back should be whats remembered. Not the "6 million" that gave up right off the bat. It's like what Trump said about McStain, "I like people that weren't captured."

0
3

[–] Newmemba 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

there was no "6 million" it is a figment of a fevered jewish mind. Do some reading on the "transfer agreement".

the jews were in process of being moved out of Germany, many were in transit camps when the war broke out.

just like the japs were in camps in USA in same period, unfortunately for the jews allied bombings caused shortages of transport, food, medicines, sanitary products, fuel etc

result was typhus epidemic and mass deaths

0
2

[–] SmackNotes 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

My point was that even if there were 6 million, other countries lost more. What makes those deaths any more valuable than all of the others?