This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
Sort: Top
[–] MrBateman 1 point 19 points 20 points (+20|-1) ago
Because we have a one vote system and no reason to split the vote. Rand Paul 2024.
[–] Gigglestick ago
Hell probably be wiser by then.
[–] OricaTonithos 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago (edited ago)
As much as I like what Rand Paul says and does, he's more of a speaker/educator than Trump. Trump is a leader that, unlike the large portion of those Uniparty goblins in DC who would rather talk nice and then slide the dagger in us all for a shot at getting accolades from the bankers, ..... GETS THE SHIT DONE.
[–] pimplepeter 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
He unfortunately doesn't have the charisma factor.
[–] Lord_Odious_the_Foul 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
If you’re looking for someone to vote for in order to solve the current predicament, then you’re looking for corn in an apple orchard. The existing order must be disassembled in its entirety and dismissed. That may sound unrealistic, but only because we’ve become comfortable in the stock yard.
[–] LuvOurPotusDJT 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Are you serious? Push Rand Paul for what? You cannot mean to be asking Trump supporters to abandon him for Paul? That just ain't gonna happen.
Gowdy is a Traitor big time, he is part of the club. I hope he gets a long visit inside GITMO, but know that it is unlikely.
[–] Tallest_Skil 5 points 1 point 6 points (+6|-5) ago
JEWISH CENSORSHIP: BYPASSED
The question isn't stupid, it's just irrelevant. Voting does nothing.
Libertarianism is an inherently flawed ideology.
SO WHY BOTHER ASKING? I'm glad you know this, but if you do know it, why bother asking?
Good man.
It's just something you have to come to grips with.
Political violence is literally the only thing the system fears.
You can vote for ZOG-approved candidates, leave for whiter pastures, call for boycotts, take part in demonstrations, practice civil disobedience, start fundraisers for activists, work in local politics, write essays or books, talk to people on the street, start a YouTube channel, create content, etc. all day long, but none of these activities actually reverse demographic trends. None of these things make the jews afraid enough to actually start giving concessions. Because none of these things are an impediment to their power.
The only positive thing peaceful activities have done is to have awakened people who are capable and willing to commit acts of violence. Dylan Roof himself was a leftist until the Trayvon Martin case, which led him to finding the truth about blacks online. Bowers was a typical cuck, until he too learned online that the white demographic replacement of his city and country were the result of jewish subversion. Both of these acts are unprecedented in America’s postwar history, and are the products of both the desperation of our current political situation as well as the fact that the truth is easier to access today online than ever before. There are two main arguments used by shills to justify why now “isn‘t” the right time for political violence. What follows are refutations for both of them.
1) “The System will become more repressive!” According to these shills, more white violence will result in the system preventing us from saying the truth online and will embolden the system to come after guns. Okay, great! The System will be preventing many normal whites from the release valve of talking to strangers online. It would make them more willing to find like-minded people in real life, where they might actually do something. Not only that but harsher “hate speech” laws would result in many normal whites becoming radicalized by facing possible jail time for simply saying the wrong things. As ever more whites are jailed for wrongthink, whites will begin to feel repressed by the system. This will awaken our collective identity and make us more willing to fight. As for guns, they’re are almost worthless in modern war. A Cohen Act-style seizure would likely result in kicking off the race war, which is why jews only ever ban guns incrementally. Here’s what William Pierce wrote about the effects of political violence:
The major purposes of political terror, always and everywhere, is to force the authorities to take reprisals and to become more repressive, thus alienating a portion of the population and generating sympathy for the terrorists. And the other purpose is to create unrest by destroying the population’s sense of security and their belief in the invincibility of the government.
2) “Just wait for the right moment, guys!” These shills claim that now “isn‘t” the time to start engaging in political violence because a collapse is “right around the comer” and will magically fix everything. If whites can‘t even organize now–when we’re still a majority and don’t have the stress of worrying about how we’ll so much as feed our families–how can we be expected to organize during a collapse? The future that whites have in store for them if they don’t fight is a South America-style slow death. Countries like Brazil and Argentina never faced a societal crisis which forced whites to reflect on their identity. As such, despite massive economic crises, whites never regained their racial consciousness. As a result, there are essentially no racially pure whites in these countries. Once more, in 2008, America had a major economic crisis which was the result of jewish banks lending currency to spics and niggers to buy houses they couldn‘t afford. Most whites lost over half of their net worth during this crisis. Some lost everything. How did they respond? They sat on their couches and waited for things to get better, or LARPed in 18th century costumes while holding banners assuring everybody they weren’t racist. Last, it‘s much better understood today how the economy functions than it was during the depression. The Federal Reserve and banks have many tools to stimulate and incentivize investment. Today, we see many consumerist nonwhites driving the economy, as opposed to whites who become cautious and save during hard times.
Roof and Bowers have helped us tremendously. Without Roof there wouldn’t be nearly as much of an effort to remove confederate statues, which has caused many whites to feel our identity is under attack. Charlottesville never would have happened either, which wouldn’t have shown us just how much public support we have–as well as teaching us the lessons of what not to do far sooner than we otherwise may have learned them. Bowers’ action will result in more jews leaving the West, making it easier for us to take power since they’re our only real threat. Both of these attacks will be used by the left to justify repression against whites when Trump is no longer in power. There needs to be organization for political violence if we’re going to any chance of coming to power. I’m not going to speculate on what this entails or tell people what to do. My advice is to read history, particularly about modern groups fighting ZOG, and think deeply about what it’s going to take to disrupt the life of the average white and to get the average nonwhite to feel that the benefits of staying in the US no longer outweigh the dangers.
[–] shillbuster1 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
u/Tallest_Skil is a defeatist divide and conquer jew shill. u/puttitout should ban this kike.
https://www.imgoat.com/uploads/f8229696f7/173014.png
[–] 15833166? 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
fuck off to reddit. You are a 30 day old account, your opinion means shit here.
[–] 3whuurs [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Also, in the spirit of naming the Leftist, wasn’t the Charlotsville protests started by a hard core leftist Obama supporter?
[–] 3whuurs [S] ago
I agree he’s certain,y less of a man then his father was, and am not a libertarian, or even huge fan of either Paul. I never said Rand would be a solution, just questioned why the right isn’t leaning towards him more. I don’t think voting does much, or anything really. But it is an event that will happen, and I’m curious how those on the right that are still retarded enough to think a solution can make its way into the WhiteHouse, and support a candidate, but aren’t retarded enough to still believe Trump has actually achieved anything that won’t disappear in undern48hrs of leaving office, don’t lean toward Rand? Like if Trump resigned right now where would they aim support? I’m not super knowledgeable on Rand but as far as you say “Rand will do nothing to divorce the US of its Jewish ownership” curious if you can expand on that. I don’t think anyone actually will either without getting shot but aren’t him and his dad the only high level politicians to take actual anti Israel steps of any kind?
[–] Tallest_Skil 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Rand isn’t Ron, unfortunately. Ron was a great isolationist and was willing to end all manner of foreign intervention. Rand is the libertarian equivalent of a champagne socialist. He’s much more of a neocon than his dad and supports even supranational unions (in some form).
Perhaps, for all the good it did.
[–] Steelerfish ago (edited ago)
Rand Paul is a swamp beast. He stood against his own principles and saved Mitch McConnell’s ass as he was about to lose to a libertarian conservative political outsider who’s views were more aligned with Rand Paul’s stayed views. Rand Paul is directly responsible for Obama care being rammed through by Mitch after Paul saved him. Rand makes a grandiose stand when his vote means nothing. When his vote will count, he bends to Mitch’s whims in exchange for pork and power. I like what Rand says, but he has zero follow through, just like the rest of the swamp. Rand’s actual actions more similar to Jeb Bush and Paul Ryan than those of his father’s. Rand would undermine Trump -even if he has previously stood for the same idea- in a heartbeat if there was a political gain to be had.
[–] Gigglestick ago
ALL for it.