You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
5

[–] Acerphoon 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It's not only a very small timeframe, it's also retarded. 40% of the land readings are literally just estimates for places without recording equipment.

Most of the actual stations are only in some places. The United States for example has a network of 1200 USHCN stations with data going back to 1895. Those stations basically show a small cooling since the 1920s

But that is when taking all USHCN stations. What the climate experts are doing, is taking these stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record, then estimate the temperatures for places without recording equipment and say that the "earth is warming dramatically".

0
0

[–] Energizedbeardedpede ago 

Thank you for your informative reply!