You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] Energizedbeardedpede 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Cherry picking weather data points over a couple hundred years to encourage fearmongering vs millions of years in existence will typically do that to your doctored predictions

0
5

[–] Acerphoon 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It's not only a very small timeframe, it's also retarded. 40% of the land readings are literally just estimates for places without recording equipment.

Most of the actual stations are only in some places. The United States for example has a network of 1200 USHCN stations with data going back to 1895. Those stations basically show a small cooling since the 1920s

But that is when taking all USHCN stations. What the climate experts are doing, is taking these stations (which show a large amount of warming since 1920) for use in the global GSN temperature record, then estimate the temperatures for places without recording equipment and say that the "earth is warming dramatically".

0
0

[–] Energizedbeardedpede ago 

Thank you for your informative reply!

1
2

[–] Diggernicks 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

The global temperature stats don't go back a couple hundred years... Like 150 at most.

0
3

[–] Energizedbeardedpede 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

My point exactly. Hence the models are all bullshit

0
0

[–] hwong ago 

ice core samples from about 80 million years ago called... they would like a word with you on that temp data range....