0
1

[–] Tallest_Skil 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I’ve never categorized the post-war system as being imperialist in nature. I think that’s probably due to its unique nature in history. Does imperialism require a series of equivalent powers which play off each other? Does it only count if it entails direct legal control or hegemony? The post-war system is literally just the Torah. It’s unlike any other empire under any other culture in history. The US isn’t in charge; it’s the dumb muscle. No government, officially, is in charge; the economic system is all private ✡individuals✡.

I’d like to draw people’s attention to Peter Zeihan’s view of the future.

If you’ve seen it, or not, what are your thoughts? How accurate? How soon will change happen, if accurate? Do I have a reason to wake up in the morning? Reason, for me, would constitute “things changing from how they are now.”

0
0

[–] bman0321 ago 

"Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders. The only amount of land we hve ever asked for in return is enough to bury those that did not return"

Colin Powell

0
0

[–] Tallest_Skil ago 

Fuck neoconservatism, fuck postmodern policy. I WANT LAND ANNEXED, NATIVES EXPELLED, AND WHITES SETTLED. Otherwise we don’t need to be going to war ever again.