You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Soyboy69 ago 

For starters you are by default attributing motivation to everything someone does based solely on who they are

Who they are and their position in society, if I knew a random jew who isn't in a position of any kind of power or where they are a mouthpeice then I'd be much more willing to give the idea that he isn't pushing jewery, but when it's a public figure that brings into the question of how and why they got to that position.

0
0

[–] canbot ago 

The thing is you think this is an intelligent way to think when it is in fact ignorant. That you are absolutely sure you're right doesn't change that fact. I keep trying to show you how this line of reasoning fails by using an example that you aren't emotionally anchored to but you just claim that it's different. It's not different. It is dumb to assume you know the motivations of everyone, even if everyone in your group of crazies agrees with you.

Secondly, it's not enough that you assume they are solely self interested and incapable of any altruism; which isn't that crazy on it's own, but then you assume that if it's good for someone else it must be bad for you. That is not how it works. That logic falls apart when blacks blame whitey, and it's no different when you use it.

White people don't hold niggers back and Jews aren't holding you back.