You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] HulkInformation 8 points -5 points (+3|-8) ago 

The suspicious part is that the BBC won't own up to the mistake. Otherwise, I hate to be the contrarian for no reason. Everyone in fact did know the building was going to collapse. There was lots of for-warning of the event because of how badly damaged it was. That's why there was absolutely nobody in it and everyone kept talking about how it would collapse.

it was a very confusing day with reporters talking 24 hours straight and it is possible some news reporters ended up with sound bites that are incorrect. The story was that the building would collapse not that it had.

[–] Mikel777 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Nice fucking spin there.

[–] HulkInformation 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

A better conspiracy theory would be to do with all the numbers of people who waited for the building to fall down for hours. Point out who they are and ask "how did they know" in a repetitive fashion with eerie music in the background. All this is, is an error on a 24 hour news cycle. It doesn't have to be spin.

[–] sore_ass_losers 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Steel frame buildings did not collapse because of fire, until 9/11.

[–] HulkInformation 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Was talking about WTC7 you thickie.

[–] SimonRothschild 9 points -9 points (+0|-9) ago 

That's where you are wrong, it has been proven in a court of law.

PS: Trump and Podesta are Satan