You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] SpeshulSnowflaek 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

He's A/B testing. He truly, honestly cannot do anything serious until and unless he has a history at least 6 months long of him threatening & warning. If he just leapt in and started hacking and slashing, lots of people (me included) would worry that maybe he really had become despotic, and the (((media)) would just inflame that to the max.

This way though, he can point back to a history of tweets and rallies and say "I warned and warned you, and yet you did nothing to fix the problem, so now I'm going to fix it for you".

[–] TheAmerican 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Hope you're correct.

[–] midnightblue1335 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

So, swift and decisive action is considered "despotic"? Bullshit.

6 fucking months of tip-toeing around and blowing hot air is 6 months of people being MURDERED and evidence being destroyed.

Inaction is not a virtue. Why should there be an arbitrary 6 months of threats required to take action? Sounds like something a jew would say. Bet they wished Hitler pussyfooted around for 6 months before doing his thing.

[–] SpeshulSnowflaek 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Hitler DID pussyfoot around for MORE than six months. He never wanted to round up and gas the Jews, he just wanted them out.

I'm just saying if you have a record of warnings, you can point to it to legitimize your actions later.