You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] thisistotallynotme [S] 5 points 0 points (+5|-5) ago  (edited ago)

I'll ask you the same questions I asked the other guy:

1) I’m curious why it’s so imperative people come to “realize” that Q is a LARP?
2) Have you followed Q? If not, how can you be an expert on this phenomenon?
3) If Q is a cult, as suggested by @ScottAdamsSays, don’t cults usually demand a certain criteria?
4) If one diverts from a cult criteria, aren’t there usually repercussions? What exactly is Q demanding of “cult members?” Why is giving us information for research a bad thing?
5) The most recent drop was a link to a bill passed in the House on censorship of the internet. Sure, it’s at .gov for anyone to find, but was anybody looking? Most people have never heard of it to look for it. This was important information for the public to know.
6) Q asks us to research his drops/things he links to, and think for ourselves. Do you have a problem w/people thinking for themselves?
7) Why are you dividing instead of uniting? No one is telling you to follow #Qanon. Why are you telling people NOT to follow Q? If it’s not for you, why not just ignore?


[–] Kodo0 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Hardcore shilling against Q is happening right now


[–] Dirty_Money 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Use your own head. The braindead American era is how we got into this mess to begin with. Trust no one.


[–] Koalemos_Grottesco 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

No one has any obligation to waste their time with loaded questions. Most of us that have remarked on Q have sufficiently observed it to know it is neocon larping bullshit. It is never impressive, tends to be post-hoc, and always with publicly available info or absolute vagaries.

Someone's disinterest or inability to answer your questions in no way validates, supports, or bolsters the veracity of Q. You're just wasting everyone's time.


[–] thisistotallynotme [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

So, no answer to the questions, then?