You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] drj2 6 points 11 points (+17|-6) ago 

Still didn't name them or even hint at suggesting them.

[–] 1HepCat 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

The censorship Gab is referring to is a letter they received telling them to delete two messages from Patrick Little. If they didn't, Microsoft (who rents out the computers that Gab runs it's entire software system on) would shut them down. The two messages were about Jews. If you look into it you'll probably find that e.g., the ADL (or some other Jewish-supremacy group) successfully pressured Microsoft to threaten shutting down all of Gab to prevent Patrick Little from typing words to other people on the internet.

[–] thephlegmbot 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago 

Please breed with a wood chipper.

[–] AvariciousNose 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Anybody that knows about the JQ will know that by being overly ambiguous about an organization means that we are trying to let the uninformed figure out themselves who has tricked them their entire lives. Giving ambiguous hints means the newly redpilled will feel smarter if they figured it out themselves.

[–] ToFat2Fish 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

You've been on voat for 3 YEARS. How have you not learned anything.

[–] drj2 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Naming the Jew and cryptically hinting at the Jew are two different things.