You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] knightwarrior41 6 points 20 points (+26|-6) ago  (edited ago)

huh? that description is open to interpretation. doesnt name anything

[–] Schreiber 1 points 17 points (+18|-1) ago 

It doesn't name shit.

People could answer it with leftist or globalist or communist or whatever other answer without actually mentioning race. If a tweet doesn't anger Shapiro, then it is not "naming the jew."

Heck, even doing "globalist = jew" is a stretch fantasy that only exist in the most extreme fringe of alt-right since even Trump uses the word globalist a lot and we all know how zionist he is and how many rabbis are behind him.

[–] Podd 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Well i thought we had this figured out a few months ago when its was declared globalist was an anti-Semitic word.

[–] tendiesonfloor [S] 3 points 9 points (+12|-3) ago  (edited ago)

In relationship to the censoring that just happens to them today by their hosting company? You can't grasp anything that isn't a literal, word-for-word smack in the head, can you?

Sometimes obvious, deliberate ambiguity is more impactful than the cudgel of explicitness, but you have to have an audience with an IQ higher than the octane level of the gas they're huffing to grasp it.

[–] drj2 6 points 11 points (+17|-6) ago 

Still didn't name them or even hint at suggesting them.

[–] goat-ditarod 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Octane analogy to IQ is genius.