You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] midnightblue1335 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

Definition of "mutilate": to inflict a violent and disfiguring injury on.

Would slicing a chunk off of a penis count as a violent, disfiguring injury?

We should stop using the jew's word "circumcision". The jew is fantastic at using words to cloak their verminous behavior. Let's just call this what it is- male genital mutilation.


[–] Master_Foo 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Just call it "Genital Mutilation". It doesn't matter if it's male or female. That is, unless you are trying to give leverage for someone to change the subject to some kind of gender studies nonsense.

Call it "Genital Mutilation" and the SJW can't argue against it without opening herself up to the possibility that it's OK to mutilate female genitals.

Call it "Male Genital Mutilation" and the SJW is going to use the word "Male" to justify that it's totally fine for this to happen to males, because reasons.

Don't give them leverage to take the conversation in a dishonest direction. When they try to take the conversation anywhere besides "Full-Stop Genital Mutilation" and make a distinction between "Male Genital Mutilation" and "Female Genital Mutilation", you say, "NO, this isn't about male this or female that. This is about Genital Mutilation. Fuck you.".


[–] midnightblue1335 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No, the "male" needs to be added. It's illegal to slice up a baby gilr's vagina in the USA and most of the West. It's a standard practice to slice up a newborn boy's dick in most of the civilized world. FGM is so absurdly rare outside of shitholes and more recently Europe, that it's not even an issue- it's already illegal in most places. How many males are mutilated every year? MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS, compared to the few hundred female victims.

When most people hear "genital mutilation" they'll immediately think about a little sheboon in Africa getting her privates slashed up with a rusty spade. This is just the way the lexicon is- most people would have to be convinced that circumcision is actually on the same level as female circumcision. Even saying something silly like "End all full-stop genital mutilation" might make most people think of the different kinds of female mutilations (I've heard horrible shit about removing the clitoris, but sometimes they remove the labia or other bits).

This is a male issue, and a language issue. We need to use male language to address it. Female genital mutilation is only an issue among savages, and it's already fucking illegal and known to be immoral. Male genital mutilation is a different issue because of its legal/culturally accepted status, and thus MGM needs to be addressed separately from FGM.

The solution to stopping FGM would be "Kill/imprison the brown people who practice that shit." The solution for MGM is not so simple.


[–] Rellik88 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

No. BEcause a cut dick looks a million times better than uncut. So no its not a disfiguring injury,


[–] blumen4alles 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I can hear that hamster wheel a spinnin'