This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
Sort: Top
[–] derram ago
https://archive.fo/rOeDY :
'Nevertheless, the FCC has continuously upheld the idea that it was under attack and has never publicly walked it back. '
'I’ve contacted the FCC and its Office of the Inspector General for more information, including the report itself, which is published at the office’s discretion. '
'When and why did Pai or his office develop the idea that the report was inaccurate, if not when it was being disseminated?'
'It was so galling to everyone looking for answers that the GAO was officially asked to look into it. '
'If the FCC had its doubts, why did it not say so instead of risking withering criticism by avoiding the question for months on end?'
This has been an automated message.