You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] D3lta105 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I hope this end up having a good outcome. But I'm not sure if that part of the world is stable enough for armed civilians. I'm all pro 2nd ammendment in US, but with how volatile things are in the middle east things might turn out differently for them.

0
1

[–] mememeyou 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

"stable" = psychopaths in charge telling you everything is fine. Yes, we would have a much more "stable world" (in the eyes of criminal oligarchs) if only the criminals in government had all the weapons... You think that right now innocent people aren't being killed in the name of "stability"? The best thing for the world is in-stability, ANY stranger with guns is more likely to be your friend than an oligarch like George Soros pushing "stability", who are actually trying to make their opponents to "stability" dead.