You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

5
-5

[–] CrudOMatic 5 points -5 points (+0|-5) ago  (edited ago)

Just like with Patrick Little, he's a deep state decoy, paired with rigged elections, to make the far-right and populism seem vastly unpopular.

He'll lose his election at 1% of the vote, and the left will brag about the right not being popular.

HELLO IDIOTS - Little in CA and Parrish in MN - both CA and MN are far-left liberal hellholes - no right candidate would ever win.

2
2

[–] Flour [S] 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago  (edited ago)

You’re a great example of a low-info tool. Explain how Parrish is deep state, without muh rigged elections.

You realize MN has been red before, and we’ve elected people like Jesse Venture. Most recent governor before the current fag Mark Dayton was Tim Pawlenty, a republican.

0
0

[–] CrudOMatic ago 

You realize MN has been red before, and we’ve elected people like Jesse Venture.

You have too many niggers now.

0
0

[–] 0rion ago 

Source for any of this, faggot?

2
-2

[–] CrudOMatic 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Common sense. Out of the blue you have 2 candidates now that are throwing red meat to both sides (don't think libshits aren't using what they say for propaganda purposes), unfortunately the side that can vote both in are a minority in the states they are running in. This gives libshit a second helping of red meat as they can point to both and say "See? Look how badly they lost! We're still popular!" as well as "red wall is election hacking! The right is unpopular!"

You should know better than to trust anyone telling you EXACTLY what you want to hear.