0
87

[–] 13011419? 0 points 87 points (+87|-0) ago 

Goats will know exactly what I mean by this but here goes;

White (and thus indirectly all other races) Americans, the only reason you have not been massacred yet is because you live in the biggest natural defensive war zone and you are armed to the fuckin teeth.

NEVER give up those guns. NEVER!

Sincerely, a fucked European.

1
38

[–] lexsird 1 points 38 points (+39|-1) ago 

You don't need 'guns' Europe. You need a backbone. There's so many damned ways to fight back it's silly, but you haven't done any of them.

0
26

[–] 13011633? 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I know and I have been ready for a long while now.

I'm armed (and fit) but a one man show is not what I'm looking for at the moment. I'm trying to redpill normies by subverting their recent mudslime-hate towards the actual source of the problem(s). Recently I have had way more success.

You're absolutely right though, Europe has been stripped clean if we're talking about average testosterone levels.

edit: I call myself a fucked European because the majority still have little clue on what's in store for them in the future. I'll die fighting even if I know it's a lost cause, but I'd prefer to win said war and keep Europe for my own race.

0
4

[–] Whitemail 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I think the majority of real Europeans are still happily living in delusional, Marxist bullshit clown world.

0
3

[–] White_pride_cis 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Like always, they’re relying on us to save their stupid, pansy asses

0
6

[–] worthlesshope 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I thought pretty hard what the "average" person can do in such situations due to another thread.. The average person isn't confident in their own power/money and or intelligence, doesn't have enough resources, and doesn't feel like they are in the position to do anything..

So I came to one conclusion. Become a dedicated follower. Find a leader and follow that guy, that's it. That leader will tell you what you could do. I don't know if that leader is tommy robbinson. Or if there is some other leader that can be followed. But really that's probably the best sacrifice you can make.

0
4

[–] BlowjaySimpson 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

People shit on the Proud Boys here, but fuck me if it isn't a great way to network with other patriots in a hierarchical structure.

0
2

[–] phareoct 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

In Canada, it's the Canadian Nationalist Party.

Believe me. ;)

0
0

[–] Plavonica 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

There would probably have to be a figurehead leader that most could look to and actual leaders who would train and prepare the civilians. The biggest problem is simply how fat the normal populace is.

0
0

[–] dontmindthemess 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You damn right! Shit, even my little, cute fiancé is packin’, with 2 extra clips. We have several thousand rounds in reserve. Fuck, my toothbrush is a gun!

4
-3

[–] UrAShillHarry 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

this is some faggot level virtue signaling lol

1
18

[–] 8_billion_eaters 1 points 18 points (+19|-1) ago 

The international bankers would gladly start WW3 and an American CW2 in order to maintain their power. An awakened public is their greatest enemy and the internet is the best tool of that awakened public.

Like Assange said, "...it's not a conspiracy theory if you have the documentation...".

1
9

[–] CheeseboogersGhost 1 points 9 points (+10|-1) ago  (edited ago)

They will not maintain power if whites revolt. all jews will be hunted like animals and anyone siding with them treated as traitors.

0
3

[–] 8_billion_eaters 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

It will happen. It may take another 200 years, but the evil, satanic, pedophile elite will be eradicated from the face of the earth. It's already begun.

0
8

[–] Alpha_Voat_Protecter 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

You're exactly right, which is why I am thankful every day that Hillary didn't successfully steal the 2016 election, since we know that she sold her soul for power decades ago, and that she would happily gut this entire country if her overlords or cronies said that she would make an extra million (or destroy a potential opponent) from the destruction.

0
18

[–] White_pride_cis 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

If you find the source for these numbers, please post.

0
21

[–] CheeseboogersGhost 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

Russia and China have wrote about attacking America scenarios. Its out there somewhere. They specifically mention Appalachia and the south being pretty much the only fight that is unwinnable from their point of view. China and Russia pretty much admit that they cant beat rednecks or patriots. We're in every state.

0
4

[–] Doglegwarrior 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

No one would want to go to war against texans... u will lose.

0
2

[–] amonamoose 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

We would give them a toss over here in the Rocky Mountains as well...

0
0

[–] ProgNaziGator 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Russia needs our tech, China needs our farmland. Current occupants to be exterminated.

I keep hoping China will decide to take over African farmland en masse instead. Would kinda be an upgrade.

0
7

[–] myleperfriend 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I agree, this is fascinating. i would really like to see the original.

2
14

[–] BentAxel 2 points 14 points (+16|-2) ago 

I heard it from a few people I know in the Military. Army, Navy and Marines. They were buntly questioned by the last administration. If a civil war broke out, would you kill American Citizens if asked. A friend that was Career Navy, said he got that question about every five years; but they did note the frequency was greater during the Barry years. But I did hear a few times. I was blown away. It seemed to have gone away by the second term. I guess he thought Whitey Was gonna Chimp out?

0
15

[–] NoisyCricket 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago  (edited ago)

There is a periodic survey the DoD provides to all arms of the military. It's been well over a decade since I've seen the questions and results leak. Regardless, one of the questions always included is, "would you be willing to use force against Americans who defended the US Constitution during martial law." Last results I saw had the highest ever recorded with the affirmative. The Marines provided a result of something around 13% would be willing to murder their fellow Americans for standing up for the US Constitution. I guess there is good reason they are called, "jar heads." The other armed forces were considerably lower (something in the 4%-8% range, IIRC, with the Air Force being on next highest).

Regardless, the point remains. Most of the military would be on the fence or uphold the US Constitution. Even though Obama shuffled many generals and high ranking officers, so he could considerably weaken this, the simple fact remains that the majority of the military would side with civilians and those who uphold the US Constitution. Thus the need for the rise of false flags, fake news, and firearm confiscation. Their only hope in a civil war is to paint the loyalist as traitors, effectively tricking the armed services into working against the nation.

Enter the rise of Q, Trump, and nationalism once again. With military intelligence working in the dark corners in support.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] BentAxel 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thank you for adding to this and clarification of what it was for.

0
0

[–] SigniferLux 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

And imagine how many of those are lying to preserve their position in the military. I know i would lie if i ever got asked about betraying my countrymen, only to hit them from the inside.

3
-1

[–] Aaronkin 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

No jokes though I can make a ton on about what you said and no pulled punch either. The guy throwing around the name Jarhead and promoting division is the the same guy who believes the "leaked " results on Civil War from a known unreliable source. Way to go Dofus. Time to wake up and think before you speak or just flat out admit your a shill. Either way your opinion is worthless.

0
2

[–] speedisavirus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Bullshit. It's literally in the oath you take in the military that you would never take the fight to the citizenry and that you would refuse orders to do so. Defend the nation against enemies foreign and domestic. A domestic enemy would be the military attacking the populace.

0
1

[–] BentAxel 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

While I agree, that's not always the case.

In regards to Ferguson MI https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-19/under-what-conditions-can-us-army-engage-american-citizens-armys-civil-disturbances-

~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act

~ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act

Whiskey Rebellion- Incidentally one of the few times in American History where the President has taken to the field as Commander in Chief https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiskey_Rebellion

Bonus Army- Where the commander of the forces who faced citizens was future General of the Army Douglas McArthur. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army

Battle of Blair Mountain - Where Browning Machine guns were used to shoot at the protestors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blair_Mountain

Executive Order 9066- The Internment of Japanese Americans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_9066

Little Rock Nine- The de-segregation of an Arkansas school that pitted the governor of Arkansas and the Arkansas National Guard against the Federal US Army. The crisis was resolved by a title 10 callup of the entire Arkansas National Guard by President Eisenhower. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Rock_Nine

Kent State shootings- The Ohio National Guard fires on student protestors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

1992 Los Angeles riots- The CA National Guard is used to quell riots in the aftermath of the acquittal of four LAPD officers accused of beating Rodney King. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Los_Angeles_riots

Hurricane Katrina- The National Guard confiscates legally owned firearms from Louisiana Citizens. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_government_response_to_Hurricane_Katrina#City_and_local_response

Anwar al-Awlaki Is killed by a AGM-114 hellfire missile fired by a General Atomics MQ-1 Predator UCAV in Yemen. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anwar_al-Awlaki

1
0

[–] midnightblue1335 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Domestic enemy specifically refers to US citizens acting against the interests of the USA. Homegrown terrorists, rebels, whatever you want to call them- they fall under "domestic enemy".

1
11

[–] Tallest_Skil 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

Oh, I have what he’s mentioning.

If there was a revolution in the US, the rest of the world would get involved, fast. Depending on the type of uprising, there is a large chance that it would not be a quick affair. It would be brutal, it would be bloody, and the US government could start a global scale war. Here are the top ten issues that came up.

  1. The US power grid can be taken down by a series of “surgical strikes” with the exception of the Texas grid. By surgical strikes, I mean a few marksmen (US army-tier Marksmen–the minimum requirement) hitting certain spots on the grid would fuck a lot of the military and government because they need the grid more than Bubba and his friends do. Additionally, while all government agencies have backup generators, they will be hard pressed dealing with the resultant looting and other madness that would come with power outages. This would effectively create another front for the military. It would also turn the people against the government more quickly and paralyze the government’s propaganda machine. Worse still–the key points of the US power grid are publicly obtainable information, and not only are the points too many to be effectively guarded, they are not guarded anyway.
  2. The estimated desertion rate in case of a civil war is 75% in the case of a left-wing president. 50% of that would be assumed to immediately betray the president. The remaining (treasonous) military would be fighting its own. Yet another front created in the war. Additionally, there is an assumed 25-50% desertion or outright betrayal rate in three letter government agencies (FBI, CIA, NSA, ATC, TSA, etc.). Additionally, it is assumed that 5% of the initial 50% betrayers would stay in their job and become saboteurs. 10% of that 50% would contain key information that would be of critical danger to the US government. Of that 10%, 1% would be able to deliver that information to the US’ foreign enemies. What you should get from this is that the second the United States government declares war on its own is the second it ceases to exist as the state we know it.
  3. “Tea baggers,” “right-wing extremists,” and “oathkeepers” which are considered untrained racists who aren’t “good with a gun” often are A) veterans who now have more time to have fun at the range, sometimes more than some Army units or Marine units. In addition to previous military training, B) often camp and do other outdoor activities–more than many in the military do, as the focus has gone away from field exercises, and C) often have better equipment–outside of armor and heavy weapons–than the military. However, C) is kind of irrelevant because many of the places in which these people could hide would make the kind of war the US fights with the equipment they use pointless.
  4. Outside influence is a huge problem. Russia has already stated they would back a Texas separatist movement, and right now we already have enough problem keeping Islam in check. The second the US has to fight in a “civil war” is the second it becomes a proxy war between NATO and whoever wants to mess with America. While America has amazing nuclear and air defense, if it comes to a civil war you have to assume that in a best cast scenario the US military is going to be operating at 50% capacity at best. Shit would go down. Hard. And fast. And if Russia–spoiler alert: one of the best militaries in the world at fighting in an urban environment–sent trainers and helpers to rebels, you can reliably bet that they would also possibly deliver weapons to them. So instead of fighting “Timmy TeaBagger,” you are fighting “Timmy TeaBagger who is buddies with Vlad.”
  5. A civil war is not just the US versus the rebels. There will be looting. There will be rioting. Cities will burn. The National Guard cannot fight both the rebels and rioters in a city that would also cut off their supplies. Additionally, if you don’t think that the rebels will send in instigators into the cities–or worse, stand alone actors (A Lone Wolf on steroids. Think Timothy McVeigh, but instead of one van they have a whole fleet of them. A good movie example would be Bane)–you would be mistaken. If the US government cannot even help its own people, why would its own people support the remaining (treasonous) military? Worse yet, if someone emptied out prisons (There are more prisoners in the US than there are people in the entire Chinese Army), you would have more crime than the police could ever handle.
  6. Logistics and infrastructure in the US are crumbling and failing. Any war fought against a rebellion in the US would be a logistical nightmare, even before the rebels started going full Al-Qaida and putting IEDs in the road. A retired general who was contracting with us on the team said, “The only thing holding together the US’ infrastructure is duct tape and the will of the Department of Transportation. And often enough, there isn’t enough duct tape.” Your most loyal cities to the US government, as we polled, are also the most logistically easy to cut off. NYC? San Fran? L.A.? D.C.? Baltimore? Most of them require crossing water to enter, from certain directions. Most of them have critical airports. Some of them have critical ocean ports. If anything happened to just TWO of the cities on the list, it would create a logistical clusterfuck.
  7. Your “Johnny Reb” and “Timmy TeaBagger” states (i.e., “red” states) all have something most of your “oh so progressive,” “Aren’t we so European,” “Oh my god, we are just like Sweden,” blue states don’t. Blues are mainly consumer states. Reds are producer states. Urban areas don’t have farms. The second that shit goes down, realize a lot of those blue areas are likely to starve. In a civil war scenario, we predicted that at least 10,000 people would die of starvation if the war was not finished in a year. The numbers get worse after that.
  8. The US has way too many choke points, and the government forces would often be on the wrong side of them. This ties into the logistical nightmare, but it also has to do with an odd phenomena. Liberals like to live near the ocean. Many of the dividers of the country, like the Rocky Mountains, the Mississippi River, Appalachia, the Missouri River (fun fact: the biggest choke point for the US government is in Missouri) are red state areas. Sure, air travel is a thing, but a majority of the US government’s needs would have to travel by ground. Even still, many of the major airports are outside of the city. Of course, the US would use military base air fields, but if civil war did break out… which bases would be safe? Which ones would have fallen to the deserters?
  9. PR Nightmare. Every rebel killed on CNN would be spun as “the US government killed X Civilians today in a strike” on foreign news and pirate media not owned by the government. That is–as pointed out earlier–if the US media could even function in a civil war or uprising. Your “rebel scum” know that the main thing that holds together the US–nay life in the US as we know it–is the 24 hour news cycle and the media. The second it’s gone, you are going to have urban anarchy. If you are from America, can you imagine a day without TV, newspaper, or Internet? Your average urban youth can’t. If you don’t think that isn’t going to cause rioting, you must have a real high regard for how much restraint they have. Assume in a civil war that your ability to talk to the people is compromised. Also assume that in the case of a civil war that rebels may know how to monitor conversations like the US does, as there are manuals online on how to do so.
  10. This one is either 1 or 10, depending on who is asked. The US will never nuke its own. The second it does, they have lost the civil war and other countries will come to “liberate” the US from its own “repressive regime.” Additionally, if any general, minuteman, nuke tech, or nuke sub captain decided to side with the rebellion, the US government is immediately SOL.

In short: The second that a “civilian uprising” or “extremist group terrorist attack” turns into “civil war” is the second the US loses. As a result, you will never see a civil war. You will see Waco, you will see Bundy Ranch, you will see all sorts of militant group confrontations and maybe even some skirmishes. But the US government fears its own people way the fuck too much to ever start a civil war.

0
5

[–] malloryquinn 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

10,000 would starve on average per day, but it would be tens of millions in the first week.

0
5

[–] Tallest_Skil 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Depending on if the power goes out or not. Blacks have next to no ability to plan for the future, but they can still work a fridge and a can opener.

1
2

[–] speedisavirus 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

They would be starving. You can go more than a week without food. It would take a while.

0
7

[–] Bigbensbathroomstall 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

For anybody wanting a good read on how this plays out, read The Turner Diaries. The shit is like literary porn for a hard right winger

0
0

[–] rnh_lurkin 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Thanks for the recommendation! Thought it was funny the book is not readily available. Found it from 3rd party sellers on ((Amazon.))

0
0

[–] ScreaminMime 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I would think that would be one of those free, public access books, available online...

0
7

[–] cyclops1771 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

This forgot to mention that if a rebellion takes place, and a state becomes a "rebel" state through legislative action or takeover of state government, they will immediately move to confiscate and take over any federal property, equipment, and bases.

That means SAC in Wichita and Omaha. That means SEAL operations center in Crane, Indiana. That means Fort Hood in Killeen, TX. That means Ellington Field outside Houston. That means the port of Mobile. That means Mayport, Kings Bay, and Naval Air Station in Jacksonville, FL. That means Fort Benning in Columbus, GA,, and amp LeJeune in Jacksonville, NC. That means Fort Campbell on KY/TN border. That means Grand Forks and Minot air bases in North Dakota.

Forget chokepoints, you would have to evacuate all your equipment to the coasts, leaving the vast majority of the country land in the hands of the rebellion.

0
2

[–] phareoct 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not only that, the government will have to keep watch out for potential cabbage farmers providing information to the rebels.

0
0

[–] cyclops1771 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Never, EVER, trust a cabbage farmer.

Every last one of those bastards is a scheming spy!

0
5

[–] NoMoreScreenNames 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Look up the 29 Palms Questionnaire/29 Palms survey some time. US miltary personnel were asked if they'd fire on US citizens , especially if at the behest of the UN. It was multiple choice, but according to the legend many of those taking the survey scrawled comments in the margins, and most of those comments were unprintable. This is question number 46:

The U.S. government declares a ban on the possession, sale, transportation, and transfer of all non-sporting firearms. A thirty (30) day amnesty period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to the local authorities. At the end of this period, a number of citizen groups refuse to tum over their firearms. Consider the following statement:

I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government

Strongly disagree (_____ ) Disagree (____ ) Agree (_____ ) Strongly agree (______) No opinion ( ____ )

That was administered all the way back in 1994. I wonder what the responses would be like today, if that survey was given again?

0
2

[–] NoisyCricket 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Ahh... there it is. I couldn't remember the name of these questionnaires. Thank you. I made a comment referencing past results above. Thank you for providing additional details.

load more comments ▼ (32 remaining)