4
24

[–] Zaqwert 4 points 24 points (+28|-4) ago 

His business, his right to do so. If it makes you salty, don't shop there.

0
1

[–] o0shad0o 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I think he's gonna get dinged hard for it though. It might wind up going to the Supreme Court again since the ruling mentioned was a "narrow decision" and not meant to set a wide precedent.

0
1

[–] HarryVonZell [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

7- 2 is not a narrow ruling. The media lied about the "narrow" bit.

11
-8

12
-9

1
15

[–] TheDonaldTrump 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago 

"No niggers" next,and "no kikes" after that,this one has endless possibilities.

2
6

[–] 9-11 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

When your right to Free Association was taken, nobody spoke up.

7
-4

0
10

[–] ImJustaBagofHammers 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

The Supreme Court only ruled that the baker's trial was unfair, they didn't necessarily rule that he has a right to refuse service to gay people.

0
1

[–] absurdlyobfuscated 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah, the verdict didn't mean what a lot of people thought it did. But AFAIK federal law doesn't prohibit a business from refusing service on the basis of sexual orientation. A lot of states have prohibition against that, like California, but I don't know what exactly Tennessee might have.

0
3

[–] Bobtheviolent 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Refusing service for a person's, race, religion , gender, or sexual orientation is not the same as refusing a specific service due to your religious beliefs.

0
0

[–] Diggernicks 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Convenient excuse tho innit.

0
0

[–] Shekelstein6M 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Technically he's not refusing service to anyone. He's expressing his first amendment rights with a sign. The customers can chose to ignore it.

0
0

[–] Bobtheviolent 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You know he will tell anyone who seems "gay" to leave.

0
2

[–] gentlemanadventurer 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

When blacks in theater say "no white people" everyone cheers. When Google says "we are not going to hire white people" it's their right. SO many leftist causes are toxic towards White people, but God forbid we as Christians fight back - all they way to the Supreme court it goes. Fuck off faggots. take your shit eating elsewhere.

0
2

[–] sunajAeon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This MOFO ROCKS!

5
1

[–] Ghetto_Shitlord 5 points 1 points (+6|-5) ago 

What a bad capitalist.

0
11

[–] IsaacJan 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

But a good American. Morals are important.

6
-5

3
1

[–] 9-11 3 points 1 points (+4|-3) ago  (edited ago)

This article by RT is peppered with enough descriptive and elective adjectives that it leaves no doubt as to their pro-faggot opinion---at least in America's sphere of influence. In Russia these same faggot rights stories have an entirely different spin.

0
1

[–] Moosh_Banger 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Been reading a lot of scare stories in the western press regarding the safety of sodomites who decide to travel to Russia for the world cup (muh homophobic Cossacks!). RT are probably trying to counter this narrative in a subtle way.

2
0

[–] 9-11 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

The geopolitics game is to promote right-ism at home because tradition is inherently strong, while promoting leftism abroad in adversarial nations because it weakens the established and hostile government. I.e. American support for leftist Ukrainian eurocucks, "moderate Islam", gay rights in Russia etc. Russia and Israel both excel at this too...theyre more responsible for shaping American self -image into this haven for migrants and Liberalism as an ideal, Frances Statue of Liberty and motto of "muh tired and weak" reflects as much. They fell for their own propaganda though.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)