2
76

[–] goatsandbros 2 points 76 points (+78|-2) ago  (edited ago)

He lost, and it was amazingly clear that the polls were rigged

Note: what you see is the realization by the Dems that they weren't cheating hard enough in some districts, and remedying that, the next time around.

1
28

[–] KatHarzso 1 points 28 points (+29|-1) ago 

1.6 million illegal shit skins got to vote for a jew that is using them cuz they're too stupid to realize they're just useful idiots.

0
18

[–] BentAxel 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Nope. That's what op is saying. How is it the state is decided 50/50 then come to the Senate and Pow, Finestein wins by leaps and bounds. I haven't been able to find one voter that voted for her, I've asked about 15 people. They voted for other Dems, but not her.

Fixed, rigged.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 27 points (+27|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] MaxAncap 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

then we'll have them by the balls

document

words are not swords.

how will you have them by the balls? how?

1
19

[–] Neral 1 points 19 points (+20|-1) ago 

So... The darkest red counties went darkest blue when it came to the Senate vote? Makes perfect sense.

0
15

[–] 22jam22 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

how can (((they))) get away with this. I know it sounds like I am being naieve. But this is a little too blatant and the timing with patrick little getting 18 percent then 1 percent.

0
4

[–] jewd_law 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I was at the ballot boxes yesterday in Sacramento. Here's my take on it:

I voted for Patrick Little in a rigged election

0
2

[–] Koalemos_Grottesco 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The mapkey shoes the darkest segments reflect CLOSE calls, hence "tie", they do not reflect that more people voted for one or the other. This perfectly explains why they are dark in both races because the results in those counties were both close calls.

0
6

[–] Durm 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Very nice thanks for that.

Why are the most red parts, also the most blue parts? Also they were probably rigged both directions. They wanted the republican against the dem rather than risking the villerosa (sp) runoff. Maybe those are the most corrupt counties.

0
6

[–] ARsandOutdoors 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Most of rural California is republican, its the cities that fuck the rest of the state

0
0

[–] NoTrueScotsman 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Interesting observation. I don't know much about Villerosa, why would the fixers want a republican on the ballot instead of him?

0
45

[–] Marou 0 points 45 points (+45|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Massive campaign fuckery and fraud, much of it chronicled on gab and 4chan. He's challenging in courts. Essentially the results aren't matching any internal candidate polling that happened before the election. Some variation is expected, but people don't go from 15+% of the vote down to 1.8% with 0 press coverage in a few days.

6
-4

1
39

[–] dayofthehope 1 points 39 points (+40|-1) ago 

(((they))) shutdown voat to prevent a response to their electoral cheating

0
13

[–] HarveyHarveyJones 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

I'm starting to think so

0
6

[–] TeranNotTerran 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

You are so ridiculous. Putt already said the disk filled up. Voat being read only or not is not going to make/break this election for them.

1
4

[–] SyriansAreTerrorists 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

"Putt" isn't even putt anymore. During the last outage the jews hijacked putt's account.

2
6

[–] Tallest_Skil 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

You were never going to do a goddamn thing. You’re still not going to do a goddamn thing. “Response”? The only response is to grab your fucking guns and literally kill all of the fucking jews and everyone else in government. NOTHING. ELSE. WILL. EVER. SOLVE. ANY. SINGLE. ONE. OF. OUR. PROBLEMS.

0
5

[–] SyriansAreTerrorists 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Everything keeps getting worse and worse. The jews flipped the Virginia votes a few months ago also.

There is absolutely no way the jews will allow trump to win again. They've been rigging all elections for several months now.

0
3

[–] Grand_Wizard 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

This is what I mean. Voting does not work because people are stupid and democracies are rigged. We can either do something soon to stop this, or die. And currently we are choosing the latter option.

3
-2

[–] Sublimesati 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Calm down. 1 tweet that catches fire is worth 10,000 guns.

3
-2

[–] Chimaira92 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Another thing I agree with you on though HOW THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU CAN PULL THAT OFF AS A CHRISTIAN?

You have to have mercy on your enemies and the only reason why the crusades happened was because of the pope and the Vatican.

So gl

2
0

[–] SChalice 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

When the voting was going on, there were 5 articles about little stuck on the front page. Take your bullshit and stupidity elsewhere. If anything, he was lucky your Little website went down.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 38 points (+38|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
6

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Awesome post. The media and tech companies work together to create their own kind of election fraud by blacking out opponents and smearing them with labels (racist, homophobe, holocaust denier, sexist, nazi, man, white, etc... )

0
3

[–] Rawrination 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Which is why we need an Internet Bill of Rights more than ever.

Also should be some grounds for Little to sue. (as if the jew controlled courts where likely to be in his favor >_<)

At least he got thousands of votes and probably a few hundred thousand people learning about him and talking about the Jew Question.

1
2

[–] OneUnderNone 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Votes per dollar isn't a sound measurement. There are easy reach supporters and there are supporters who are hard to reach. The factors you listed about his outreach were exactly why he didn't get more supporters. He needed more exposure, not more money spent.

0
1

[–] Sublimesati 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

"He needed more exposure not more money spent"... Huh? What do you think the money gets spent on? You spend the money on ads and airtime which IS exposure. Imagine a T.V. commercial explaining how much money is given to Israel every year and promising that money (and all AID money) goes to blacks for reparations. Imagine a reformed immigration measure that allows a path to citizenship with 24 months of California Conservation Corp job commitment (plus other things like 5 years new immigrant probation that if violated would revoke citizenship etc many other stipulations as well) I think the pro American pro white candidate would have a great chance.

0
2

[–] thatguyiam 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Very thorough analysis, Mr Data.

3
-2

[–] InternetUser 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

If I run and vote for myself and only spend 1 penny on a post it note ad somewhere then I got at least 100 votes per dollar.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
24

[–] baneofretail 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

He received 1.8% of the total votes cast. I only heard a blip about him on the news then silence. They intentionally avoided covering him so a conversation wouldn't develop.

0
6

[–] l_voated_today 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

After Trump it will be a full media black out on outsider canadates.

1
5

[–] Acerphoon 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Polls aren't that accurate obviously, but how do you go from 15% to 1.8%? This is either a massive coincidence or planned

0
7

[–] Ghetto_Shitlord 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

The pollsters fucked up exactly on one poll, and the racist / anti-semites just ran with it, ignoring the many others that had realistic numbers.

1
-1

[–] SChalice 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

1.4%, honestly can any of you tell the truth?

0
14

[–] coinphrase 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

I'm seriously thinking about leaving this shithole state. If we can't even have a fair election, then what is the point?

0
13

[–] Whizwit21 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Revolution

4
-3

[–] Ghetto_Shitlord 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

What wasn't fair?

8
-7

1
6

[–] Moosh_Banger 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

He went in with a chainsaw when what is needed is a surgeons scalpal.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] Moosh_Banger 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Democracy is a weak instrument when one seeks to engage in revolutionary politics. In almost all cases where a ruling elite is driven from power, a massive societal collapse is needed. Have people line up at soup kitchens, or suffer under hyperinflation (as occured in the Weimar republic) and people will overnight lose their conditioning and listen to even the most extreme voices. For so long as the US has a functional economy folks will continue to vote for the status quo. Until then people like Patrick Little will only ever appeal to the fringes of society. His message was not only too radical, but also one dimensional.

4
1

[–] Tallest_Skil 4 points 1 points (+5|-4) ago 

oy vey goyim don’t name the jew

Fuck the hell off.

0
4

[–] EyeOfHorus 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Candidates have to pay a fee to have a bio listed in the voter pamphlet. The candidate picture and paragraph costs thousands of dollars. Congressional candidates must pay at least $8k, so its likely that Senatorial costs are even greater, perhaps substantially so.

Little did amazingly well for a one man show, on a shoe string budget, with all of mainstream media maligning him and his own party disavowing him.

Had he merely had budget for the voter pamphlet his numbers would have been substantial.

0
1

[–] DukeofAnarchy 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

What would he have put in the pamphlet - "happy merchant" memes? His entire campaign seemed to be about how much he hates The Jews.

2
-2

[–] EyeOfHorus 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Did the media's negative campaign against Little work on you? America first, by ensuring that only US Citizens manage the US government, does not equal Jew Hate. I'm certain the kikes would like you to think otherwise. Do you? Do you really think Little's campaign was about hate? Or, are you transferring your own frustrations? He called out dual citizen mexican candidate also. Does he hate mexicans?

But, responding to your question, sure, a happy merchant meme would have gathered more votes from "the bad guys won WWII" crowd such as yourself. Functionally, the state secretary would censor such a bio, but maybe some dog whistle would suffice. Heck, just a picture of Little in the pamphlet would have gathered more votes.

Realistically, Mr. Little could have simply written *I want to build a wall to secure our border, prosecute illegal aliens to the fullest extent of the law, and enact legislation limiting political office to US Citizens only. Read more at www.littlerevolution.us *

Guaranteed he would be challenged by one of Feinstein's strawmen, but I think it would pass censors. The problem is that the state charges money to list a bio. Just like they charge money to be on the ballot in leu of the tens of thousands of signatures (which cost money also). Just like they made it a best 2 primary. Its so we never have choices.

0
0

[–] sunajAeon 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Frankly he kicked ass-this is just the beginning

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)