0
0

[–] Tallest_Skil 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I don’t like the language this guy is using. “Alexander Hamilton was a nationalist.” No, no, no, no, no. Hamilton was a Rothschild agent. He was, at “best”, a FEDERALIST, who saw and demanded (as can be seen in his executive proposal at the Constitutional Convention–see video 1) absolute supremacy in–and UNDELEGATED POWER GRANTED TO–the federal government, rather than the state governments.

He wasn’t a “nationalist” because ‘nationalist’ has a definition. I don’t understand why this guy is using that term.

0
0

[–] ArchmageMordenkainen [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Calm your tits, he's not trying to vilify nationalism. He probably just meant that Hamilton was a nationalist in the sense that he saw the US has a unified, centralized nation as opposed to a loose confederation of autonomous states.

0
0

[–] Tallest_Skil 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

He ought to explain that, then, or reference another of his courses in which that’s explained. I don’t like seeing definitions perverted.

0
0

[–] jesus_is_lord 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] ArchmageMordenkainen [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Is that really so surprising though? A common ancestor from over eight hundred years ago isn't that big a coincidence, all things considered.

0
0

[–] jesus_is_lord 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

what does it mean?

0
0

[–] ConquistadorCoronado 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Dude if you have ANY English ancestry you too are probably descended from him.

http://familypedia.wikia.com/wiki/John,_King_of_England_(1167-1216)

0
0

[–] jesus_is_lord 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago