You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Butterbread ago 

Thanks for the links. Here's one for you: http://www.debunking911.com/

0
0

[–] belphegorsprime ago 

I've already encountered much of the "debunking" literature. Most of it successfully debunks several straw man arguments, but nothing debunks the laws of physics. Building 7 in freefall is a smoking gun. BTW, NIST eventually admitted it was in freefall.

0
0

[–] Butterbread ago  (edited ago)

I have to admit that building 7 freefall is extremely strange.

However, is there footage from the other side of that building? Apparently, the collapse of the center of the building happened first, sort of leaving a shell that started collapsing about 1-2 seconds after. I believe this scenario is supported by the few images I have seen of the damage before collapse. Put another way, half the building started falling and then the other half began. This seems like a possible reason for the freefall.