This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ScannerDarkly ago (edited ago)
Acceleration due to gravity is still going to apply the force equally to both parts of the building.
Also the video evidence shows linear acceleration to a steady speed , not freefall acceleration. If there was solid building underneath, it would be impossible for the top portion to accelerate as it went down.
Your insults are meaningless and take away from your argument.
You are still wrong and don’t understand how physics works.
[–] Butterbread ago
You started with the condescension.
40 floors come crashing down. Does that mass at that acceleration have enough force to crush the one floor below it? Keep asking that all the way down.
[–] ScannerDarkly ago
For every floor that is crushed below, one is crushed above. 40 floors above cannot crush 40 stronger floors below without additional help.
Please explain why Newton’s third law ceases to exist in your example. Why does the top portion stay intact while the stronger bottom portion is vaporized.