This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] bisteot 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
So...
It would be better if I had to work to maintain a woman?
If I had less competition in my work to achieve greatness?
If a man is unable to find a woman that is worth it, not a whore, responsible, it is the man fault for being a beta that looks for the minimum.
I don't give a fuck about a useless woman having an abortion. I actually encourage that, it is better to avoid weak people to pass their weakness to new generations.
And I apply the same standards to men. We should not be dogs that put their dick in any hole.
[–] Glory_Beckons 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
Yes, actually, that would be better.
Gives you more motivation to succeed and frees your woman to work on maintaining your home, having more children and actually raising them. Instead of outsourcing the job to Nanny State and Big Brother Media.
You view women as competition and call yourself a man?
There are extremely capable women, mind you. But they're not meant to be our competition. We're meant to be partners. To secure a future for our kind. The best thing women can do for our people is to give life to a new generation. It is the only thing we cannot do without them. And without it, we have no future. Everything else we do is then for naught. So this must be their highest calling. Especially the most capable of women. We need them to pass on their genes. Not waste away trying to be poor imitations of men.
A naive platitude that misses the point entirely: "Liberation" has turned the majority of women who could have been worth it into whores. This is great for those that want whores. But a problem for those that want worthy mothers for their children, and therefore for the future of our society. Your vapid MUH DICK'ing doesn't make that problem go away.
Your other two points I agree with.
[–] bisteot 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
I see everyone I work as as competitors. Men and women, if they are worth it of course.
I totally disagree, because I do want a partner in my personal life, I wouldn't search for a useless women unable to sustain herself that would stay at home doing shit, without education or any other ability than spread her legs and give birth while turns slowly into a whale.
I can totally take care of my wife during birth and the first month/years. But would absolutely demand of her to return to work force once raising the child is done with MY help and participation. Instead of working 16 hourse a day without having the chance to look at my own kid because I think only I can provide in a work of 2.
[–] McFluffy 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
you would be right but the flaw here is that the abortion rate is really low compared to the birthing rate. thats why the problem is getting worse and worse.
[–] bisteot ago
I do agree that birth rates are plumbing and that is a bad thing.
I don't blame that on women per se. I think that is because economy is shit, and I think economy is shit because states have been applying economic legislation that benefits greatly private enterprise above the right of the workers and permits that ultra big companies and banks speculate with credits, houses and the overall market.
Ain't women fault that education cost is so unbearable, that insurances companies are shit or that healthcare is non existent.
[–] everef ago
You can't have a stable peaceful free society if lower status males are unable to form families. They will not happily toil away for decades without that reward. Blame the men all you want for their failings, but if you want a nice society to live in, blaming isn't going to do any good.