0
29

[–] MarcusA 0 points 29 points (+29|-0) ago 

Site-less blockchain Internet will emerge rapidly if this happens

0
10

[–] 12023510? 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Yep it's already started. Think of a merging between bittorrent and blockchain where you get to connect to an anonymous system. You get paid to contribute. Not only content but bandwidth and hdd space as well all managed by blockchain.

0
7

[–] revofire 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

We already have systems like that but they're not widespread, so we need them to gain popularity.

2
5

[–] carlip 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

nothing is anonymous

0
1

[–] ForTheUltimate 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

isn't steemit?

0
7

[–] talmoridor-x 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

This x1000. The kikes may as well ban computers

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] MarcusA 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I agree, my IF was a reference to the passage of the bill. Indeed, out beloved gvt wants nothing more than to remove anonymity and thereby stifle and suppress dissent. I acknowledge that this is already happening.

The issue is that the public is lazy and/or, its hard for the writhing mass to bud the needed momentum to do big things like reinvent the internet. Things of this scale do happen, but they usually take some watershed event. For Instance, Boston Massacre, Separatist Fire on Fort Sumter, Rosa Parks. There usually has to be a Flashpoint.

0
20

[–] CheeseboogersGhost 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

The filthy jews are desperate to try & silence dissent.

0
4

[–] 0110001111 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Also, it's not like people can just hand out and talk to each other in person. Of wait, they're trying to ban that too....

0
1

[–] crazy_eyes 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

They listen in on your cell phone for a reason

0
2

[–] obvious-throwaway- 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Don't worry, this won't affect the actual child raping Jews, just people who would never consider such actions. No different than creating laws to limit gun owners because people who used guns illegally broke laws.

0
11

[–] OhBlindOne 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

If this passes, Twitter would get shut down almost immediately (you know, if it wasn't a CIA op)

0
0

[–] Oh_Well_ian 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

1
9

[–] Tallest_Skil 1 points 9 points (+10|-1) ago  (edited ago)

This enables one troll or spammer with CP to effectively kill any website they don't like for any petty reason.

Sounds like a plan. We ought to post comments on official government websites (through a VPN, obviously) that we want to kill so and so. Not a government official, but just some random guy. Then the government itself is legally responsible for tens of millions of threats of murder. Oh, and every liberal website. Sneak illegal content onto them, too. Not that it matters, because the rule of law doesn’t exist and no one in the government will ever be punished for this or any other crime they committed, but still.

This will kill smaller content creators internet wide and lose tons of great smaller communities.

Well, yeah. That’s the point. If you can consolidate all discourse onto, say, 10 websites, you put jews in the CEO chair of those websites and you then own and direct all human thought.

Spread this around and call your congressman to vote NO

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA YOU THINK THAT DOES ANYTHING

This will punish site owners for what their users post by fine or potential jail time of 20 years.

PLEASE let us get Jim Watkins killed.

1
5

[–] 12023548? 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

They will. Only take down the conservative web sites. The liberal ones will flourish. It will kill the internet if it happens then a new anonymous blockchain and bittorrent one will spring up in a moment and take its place. I'm kinda OK with it honestly. It would improve anonymity in the long run

0
2

[–] Gorillion 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yep, it's the "everyone is automatically a criminal under this umbrella law" followed by selective, ideology-led enforcement.

0
4

[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA YOU THINK THAT DOES ANYTHING

Sitting around on your hands does even less. Right now all we can do is try to show that it isn't just the big boys in Silicon Valley who hate this.

0
4

[–] Maroonsaint 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

If this happens I hope wevery website left and right all go down so they realize what a mistake it was. I really wish they would stop trying to ruin the internet

2
4

[–] Tallest_Skil 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

Wishes don’t stop jews. Bullets do, and nothing else.

0
0

[–] Wahaha 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

What makes you think that isn't the goal in the first place?

0
2

[–] Cat-hax 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You're funny, they are above the law.

0
6

[–] nigger_plz 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

So this should apply to Hollyweird because they let pedos work with kids. Shut down Hollyweird.

0
5

[–] LionElTrump 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Will Twitter and Reddit be made examples?

0
10

[–] TheonGreyjoy 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

LOL nope. They are simply too big for them to go after. VOAT, 8chan, kiwifarms, and the like, fair game.

0
9

[–] Kannibal [S] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Early VOAT users will remember when this exact thing happened to VOAT, trying to get Voat shut down.

could happen again.

0
0

[–] LionElTrump 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It's disgusting. Hate to see Twitter, Reddit, Fakebook be Grandfathered by the establishment DOJ and shutdown sites like VOAT, GAB, and whatever future outlets that become too expensive for them to bot the fake reality

0
4

[–] 0110001111 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Possibly the most communist bill ever. Essentially, the idea of collective punishment is alive and well. It looks like since the communists and kikes cant win the normal way, blanket censorship and squashing all the fringe sites is the next route

0
3

[–] Merlynn 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

See,the problem I have with all these child porn laws is I don't think it's logistically viable to actually enforce them anymore.

One example of this is "sexting". Especially considering it's popularity with underage people. Are we going to bust all those kids for "making child porn"? For that matter,can any of you honestly prove every naked person on your harddrive is "of age" since many porn sites have sweepers that collect any naked image found and put it up?

And then we have fictional characters like Dot Warner,who looks like a child but according to the opening narration is over 60 years old. Where does she stand? What about Baby Herman? There's an awful lot of "art" out there with naked kids in it we'd have to get rid of,including statues and irreplaceable relics. What is and isn't "fair game" for artistic expression? How far do we go with that?

And if you think that's a philosophical argument,let me make it real for you. Little Lupe. A porn actress who's youthful appearance has had her dragged into a court of law more than once to prove she is,in fact,over 18. Not scary enough? Australia banned women with small breasts from making porn. And then there's the whole Traci Lords fiasco where an underage girl duped the entire porn industry and ruined a lot of lives by lying about her age. This kind of thing creeps up on you and it's just as unfair as no protection for children at all.

Frankly,I don't really think people are looking at this issue logically and with a realistic idea of what we can and can't do. And in all honesty,I'd rather go after people actually abusing kids rather than some guy jerking it to a picture on the internet. Unless he knowingly paid for porn of kids cause that's material support of a crime. Unless it's a drawing. Cause a photo is proof of abuse but a drawing can be pure imagination.

0
1

[–] hikoo 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Does this affect fictional porn? There's no person being sold in a drawing/animation but I guess the prudes of america will find a way to make this work against hentai somehow.

0
0

[–] Merlynn 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

A lot of porn sites have already purged all pictures of underage characters because of threats of legal action. Most of them implied the US was involved. To my knowledge,drawings of underage sex and nudity aren't illegal on a federal level,but state and city laws can differ. As for this law,I can't say there either because I haven't read it. But I do know laws bent on making something illegal when it's already illegal usually have a bunch of new rules that seem to be made to make more people criminals.

In the end,it all smells like bullshit to me,so they might very well go that way either with this law or trying for a "package deal" with this law and something against drawings. Which is weird cause most of the ruling class are pedophiles,so they should be looking at loosening the child sex laws,shouldn't they?

load more comments ▼ (23 remaining)