This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
Sort: Top
[–] OhRutherfordBehave 2 points 16 points 18 points (+18|-2) ago
WW1 was white genocide. WW2 was white genocide. And I am sick and tired of the romanticism. What am I supposed to do, watch your movie about WW2 to romanticize our own fratricide in order to line the pockets of the Jew (pushed and profited by Jews) and commit genocide against ourselves?
I know this isn't the point of your meme, but I really have fucking learned to hate all the WW2 propaganda.
[–] ardvarcus 1 point 15 points 16 points (+16|-1) ago
WW1 never had to take place. It was pure military opportunism on the part of the European powers. And America had no business being in the war at all. WW2 never needed to take place. Churchill and Roosevelt were determined to crush the rising power of Germany regardless of the cost, and the cost was the end of the British Empire and the Iron Curtain. And again, America had no business being in the war at all. The only winners in WW2 were the Jews, who got their own free country out of it. They've been milking Germany and other nations ever since, inclusing the USA. If we have another world war, please, can we blow up non-white people for a change?
[–] OlympicWalrus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I suppose you could say no war ever needed to take place by this logic.
[–] heybaebay ago
Wow. That is so fucking true. I never actually looked at it that way before now.
[–] Scald85 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
My suspicion is that modern LGBTWTFBBQism is actually based in WW2 practices. Extreme stress, lack of access to women, close male comradeship, morphine, antibiotics, no AIDS = carnal fraternizing. If 10% of people are "prison gay" then maybe a fifth are military gay in these circumstances. These artificial homosexuals happened to hit their political influence prime in the 1960's, when leftism exploded into the culture, although they had introduced rock and roll in the 50's. Tutti Frutti. The leftism of the 60's made it easier to recruit new artificial faggots into the community, which has only continued to grow. Drugs, especially opioids, are de facto encouraged in the West. This is to facilitate recruitment.
Jews and "natural homosexuals" are by nature outcasts and couldn't have subverted the mainstream culture without a trojan horse that could blend into the establishment. My theory of what was actually being created by WW2 explains the long game better than any other model. Puritan morality (no war brides or rape allowed) mixed with warfare always turns into a sausage fest later. Killing without rape is truly unnatural, when you think about it enough. Russia took a more lenient stance towards their soldiers' supposed atrocities and they didn't get queered like the West.
[–] heybaebay ago
Interesting
[–] Gimmemymoney 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
So the soldiers who did great things saving Americans means nothing? They sacrificed themselves over manipulation they gave their lives over fucking kikes.
[–] Tallest_Skil 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
How’d they save Americans? They caused the genocide of America.
[–] randomination ago
bad goy
[–] Gimmemymoney 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Fuck niggers.
[–] kammmmak 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Fuck (((hollywood))) making a big deal about niggers
[–] undertheshills 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I saw 2 of them in the film. Are they mad there wasnt a big mouth nigger officer screaming aww hell naw every time a bomb goes off.
[–] WithoutaDoubt 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
What I'd like to know what definition of diverse are they using? The nigger is black skin, black hair, black eyes, nothing diverse about that at all.
[–] lord_nougat 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
...and that's what the red pill tastes like.
[–] 11895206? ago
Like a gross nappy nigger?
[–] crazy_eyes ago
Too bad the skin is shit brown not black
[–] Ocelot 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Every now again you see an actually black nigra, like the Niggest. My grandfather called them blue-gum niggers, I think.
[–] Schreiber 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yep.
Diversity has been the code word for white genocide for a really long time now. Funny thing is that I actually figured it out by infiltrating a leftist organization instead of reading "far right" website and shit. It's the truth, it's not a conspiracy theory.
[–] 11891342? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
There were no black people to speak of in Britain in the 1910s! Maybe one of Hailie Selassie's nephews was a student at some boarding school or something. But they weren't importing Jamaicans and Ghanaians yet. WTF are they smoking?
[–] 11895219? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
There were a few but they pretty much weren't in this war in any real number to the point most battles probably had no niggers at all
[–] TrumpTheGodEmperor ago
Out of curiosity, can you tell more? Like do they believe their own bull shit? Do they truly hate white people? What kind of people are they, typical college brainwashed libtards?
[–] 11893160? ago (edited ago)
ETA: Britain had almost no migration from nog countries until after WWII. There were probably some very wealthy ones, like king- or diplomat- level ones, who had homes in London before then, but it wouldn't have been many. From wikipedia:
I don't know WTF is going on in Britain these days, I don't have that much insight into it. But there were almost no Blacks in the country in the WWI era. Also, lately I hear entertainers saying the goofiest shit, things like "I feel betrayed by my own whiteness, my own skin" etc. (that one was Cameron Esposito, from a recentish episode of Marc Maron's podcast) It's just delusional.
People have gone totally around the bend. There's also the obvious double standard of re-casting everything from productions of A Streetcar Named Desire to BBC series about medieval France with Blacks, but white people can't play anything that wasn't historically written as white. They're also trying to Blacken American heroes/founding fathers like Hamilton. (Please take a look at his nose and complexion and tell me again how Black his mammy was.) This is like whole swathes of the population beating themselves up for no reason, over stupid shit in the entertainment industry that doesn't matter.
You can cast all the Blacks you want as computer scientists, almost none of them will be smart enough/inspired enough by that to study it. You can cast Black women as Joan of Arc, it won't make them remain virgins, inspire a devotion to God or as sense of duty to their countrymen.
It's baffling, stupid and insulting to everyone's intelligence to go along with this foolishness.
[–] culofiesta 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
and guess which one actually happened
[–] prairie 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is like people criticizing a movie for having an evil, sadistic character. A movie tells a story, and the story has the characters that the writer writes into the story. To change the characters would be to tell a different story.
[–] newoldwave 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Let's change history to fit the diversity agenda.