You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
16

[–] BLOODandHONOUR 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Ha! And no guns to stop them

0
8

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Especialy ironic since it woud be easy in the UK with cops not carrying guns and all.

0
11

[–] CognitiveDissident5 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Only a small unit is armed and they're so fucking nervous around their guns it's embarrassing.

0
1

[–] GuyIDisagreeWith 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Actually, some of them do. If they want to use them it takes too long to fetch them from their arsenal. Yes, the "no-guns" British Police do have an arsenal full of guns.

0
7

[–] fusir 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The average voater here would dislike somebody who shot at cops for enforcing an unjust law.

A while back people were shitting on some kid for shooting at a cop resisting arrest for a marijuana charge. It's the same thing you're arguing for here. What I would argue is not that what you are arguing for is wrong, but we need to see it as right in more cases.

We need to recognize the falacy of kohlberg stage four morality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg%27s_stages_of_moral_development

While the law is just being implemented you suggest that it is just to shoot at cops for enforcing an unjust law (and it is), but when the law has existed for 10 years you will say it's wrong. The justness of the law didn't change. The only truth in this case is that your morality is programmable and that the programming changed over 10 years.

Now you may say these drug laws are immoral dispite existing for 10+ years but the inconsistency is that one is worth killing over and the other would somehow make someone scum if they did.

0
3

[–] go1dfish 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] RightEdge 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

my morality justifies shooting somebody just like your commie ass.

0
0

[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

In Stage four (authority and social order obedience driven), it is important to obey laws, dictums, and social conventions because of their importance in maintaining a functioning society. Moral reasoning in stage four is thus beyond the need for individual approval exhibited in stage three. A central ideal or ideals often prescribe what is right and wrong. If one person violates a law, perhaps everyone would—thus there is an obligation and a duty to uphold laws and rules. When someone does violate a law, it is morally wrong; culpability is thus a significant factor in this stage as it separates the bad domains from the good ones. Most active members of society remain at stage four, where morality is still predominantly dictated by an outside force.

1
0

[–] AinzOown 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Weed rights and thought police are on two different spectrums. I'd shoot thought police if they tried me. Free speech is protected by the Constitution and fuck anyone who infringes it. Drugs are not.

4
-4

[–] mightnotbearobot 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago  (edited ago)

haha the guns would help against a fully armed army, navy and air force haha one bloke with a shotgun and 12 hours on CS:GO could stop a military haha.

I would like to respond to you but I cant because of free speech.

How has American suffered through 8 years of tyranny under Obama when the Dems took all the guns but also had all their guns confiscated because of Sandy Hook but also have over a gorillian guns?

0
12

[–] pcdude 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

If all the police and military of the United States started to go door to door collecting guns, and only 1 out of 100 gun owners killed 1 government representative, they would run out of police and military halfway through the confinscation.