You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
70

[–] srgmpdns 0 points 70 points (+70|-0) ago 

I'd settle for "has a valid ID"

1
20

[–] White-Supremacist 1 points 20 points (+21|-1) ago 

https://i.imgur.com/slB2Vhr.jpg Enforcing this feels like a good direction.

1
4

[–] Pawn 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

FBI counts mexicans as white, this means all the illegal votes for hillary are now legal, now and in the future.

[–] [deleted] 4 points 6 points (+10|-4) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] SocksOnCats 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Landowners only. And only white men can own land.

8
-7

[–] twee 8 points -7 points (+1|-8) ago  (edited ago)

All the self-determinists can fuck off to their little patch of grass and HAM radios where they can die of sepsis after trying to grow their own food, because they'll get charged for using the road system and the grocery store doesn't deliver to bum-fuck-nowhere, and run everything on solar and wind power; cuz that shit could have totally happened when it did without government subsidies.

And the rich who stow their taxes in anonymous offshore accounts. Those bags of dicks can smoke a fat fag on their private island for all I care, so long as they stfu and move along.

0
4

[–] weezkitty 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's fucking insane that ID for voting is controversial. You need ID to buy liquor but not to determine who runs the country? That's absurd. Even MEXICO has voting ID requirements. If you really aren't qualified to get a state ID, chances are you really shouldn't be voting.

0
2

[–] con77 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

amen