0
70

[–] srgmpdns 0 points 70 points (+70|-0) ago 

I'd settle for "has a valid ID"

1
20

[–] White-Supremacist 1 points 20 points (+21|-1) ago 

https://i.imgur.com/slB2Vhr.jpg Enforcing this feels like a good direction.

1
4

[–] Pawn 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

FBI counts mexicans as white, this means all the illegal votes for hillary are now legal, now and in the future.

[–] [deleted] 4 points 6 points (+10|-4) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] SocksOnCats 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Landowners only. And only white men can own land.

8
-7

0
4

[–] weezkitty 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's fucking insane that ID for voting is controversial. You need ID to buy liquor but not to determine who runs the country? That's absurd. Even MEXICO has voting ID requirements. If you really aren't qualified to get a state ID, chances are you really shouldn't be voting.

0
2

[–] con77 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

amen

3
20

[–] Slagiatt 3 points 20 points (+23|-3) ago 

I think being on any form of welfare should automatically disqualify you from voting. Food stamps, housing, wicc or whatever that shit is. If you cant even run your own life well enough to get by without charity, you have no business making important decisions for the country as a whole.

0
8

[–] BlackSheepBrouhaha 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Including any business you own. Government subsidies are welfare.

0
5

[–] fusir 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I've said something about this that I think is worth bringing up. I think if you receive money from the government as a corporation you should have to give up your right to "electoral speech."

Corporations are people, but that also means they can sign away rights on contracts. People who get money out of the government shouldn't get to impact elections. It's language that would be easy enough to add to government contracts.

0
1

[–] RedditIsForLiberals 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I agree.

0
0

[–] chirogonemd 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I mean, I agree that the fed should keep its paws out of commerce and stay out of the business of trying to bolster markets. But I think we can agree that subsidies to a productive business that is doing something, at least, marginally valuable to its community is different than a jobless leech providing nothing. Both of these are issues, but minimizing government involvement in business and using taxpayer dollars to subsidize an individual life of laziness aren't in the same ballpark.

1
3

[–] SayTan 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

That is a logical angle. Literacy tests are long dead.

0
3

[–] fusir 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Math is the new literacy. Let's use that. Basic stuff, what is the inverse of an exponential function.

1
2

[–] GeneralFucktardeder 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

I can get behind this with a few changes to the idea. Those changes include not taking away the voting rights of veterans who were injured during wartime, and not taking away the voting rights of disabled people in general so long as they are deemed mentally sound with an IQ high enough not to vote for gibz. Also disqualification should only occur when you are on welfare. If someone can turn things around and get off of it then they are most likely competent enough to have voting rights. Not that you specifically stated that it was permanent disqualification but that's how I took it.

0
2

[–] Slagiatt 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Sounds groovy

0
1

[–] EvilSeagull 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I've been saying that forever. They only vote for more free stuff for themselves, they could care less about the country.

2
12

[–] WarAtTheZoo 2 points 12 points (+14|-2) ago 

High IQ native born tax payers. If you move here from somewhere else, you get no say in how things are run.

0
3

[–] rndmvar 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Imagine that happening at the State level too. Suddenly Commiefornians need to fix their mess if they want to continue having a state/county/locality level say anymore.

3
-1

[–] riposte 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Hi, I'm here to administer the intelligence test. A score of 60 is required to pass. Please answer these questions to determine your ability to vote.

Q1) There are ___ amount of genders. A) 2 , B) 4, C) 7, D) infinite
Q2) 1 + 1 = ___ . B) 1, D) 2
Q3) Citizens gain their rights from ____. A) God, B) The constitution, D) The government
Q4) What is the most peaceful religion? A) Christianity, D) Atheism D) Islam, D) Judaism,
Q5) 2 + 2 = ___. D) 4
etc)
.
.
.
.
.
Cheat sheet: all A answers -10 to IQ score. All B answers +0 to score, All C answers +2, All D answers +5 to IQ score.

Check to see how you did!

2
10

[–] Tallest_Skil 2 points 10 points (+12|-2) ago 

28th amendment: The 19th amendment is hereby repealed. Voting franchise is henceforth to be extended to men who are net taxpayers.

0
4

[–] Slagiatt 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I can get on board with that

0
0

[–] Buggsie_Blue 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

We could go the Starship Troopers route and only grant voting privileges to those who do some sort of military service.

0
0

[–] Tallest_Skil 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

What happens when we win, though? In a fully white world, we won’t need a standing military. No country built around wartime is going to last.

1
-1

[–] Maroonsaint 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

My favorite amendments are the 14th 18th and 22

1
0

[–] Tallest_Skil 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

14th

Uh… why? It gave citizenship to freed slaves (AND ONLY FREED SLAVES; ANCHOR BABIES ARE NOT US CITIZENS AND NEVER HAVE BEEN. EVEN HARRY REID ADMITS IT) instead of just deporting them back to Africa.

0
0

[–] fusir 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

1,2,5. Though we violate all three all the time.

0
6

[–] l_voated_today 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

It is kind of unfair that the dumbest and laziest have as much of a vote as the smartest and hardest working but any system put in place to correct for that would be ripe for abuse.

0
1

[–] ScreaminMime 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Uhhhh, no, ever hear of Super Delegates?

0
3

[–] l_voated_today 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

You think super delegates represent the smartest and hardest working members of society?

0
0

[–] goatsandbros 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

This is not a counterexample to abuse.

0
6

[–] con77 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

hard to believe. Half the nation almost voted in a corrupt sociopath serial killer.

0
1

[–] fusir 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah, democracy is a recipe for disaster. Or maybe it is improperly limited democracy because if it didn't have the powers to do horrible things it wouldn't matter as much. What could Hillary have done? Maybe all of those are things design amendments around.

0
1

[–] con77 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

That bought and paid for whore would have flooded us with muslims. Chipped away at the 2nd amendment until it was meaningless. And paved the way for the antichrist

0
0

[–] barraccuda 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Here is a conundrum. What biases can be involved in a democratic process that are immune from manipulation?

Or another way of saying it. What key properties of democratic function can we set in stone so as to give the best results.

0
5

[–] kevf4 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

There are a lot of other things I would rather fix. For example, no more dual citizenship.

1
0

[–] ScreaminMime 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

This would right itself once the voting was worked out. Defrauding the vote should be #1.

1
3

[–] 11165078? 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

I always liked the idea of if you don't pay taxes you don't get to voat. Something like 2000/year? This means all the leaches and welfare queens and rich tax scammers and niggers and takers don't get the voat. It would fix everything...

load more comments ▼ (28 remaining)