You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] senpaithatignoresyou 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

If true i would wager it is destroying evidence.

Are there any navy ships in the area? The air search radars would detect a missile launch. We would know if we launched a missile at a mansion on an island. No one on a ship in todays navy could keep their mouths shut. There are coast guard patrols, and navy patrols hunting for drug ships, so they would know if a missile was launched.

Now, a firebombing would make more sense, and you could write it off as either a gas leak, or faulty wiring, or hurricane damage, or corrosion, or defective electronics. Nothing suspicious about any of those, and much much cheaper than a missile.

you burn the mansion down, get it labeled as "condemned" and non would be allowed to go on the island to investigate it.

1
0

[–] TheGodHead 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Destroying evidence implies they have a suspicion of prosecution which they wouldn't.

0
0

[–] senpaithatignoresyou ago 

Saudi game of thrones ended, and as a result, the democrats and cucksertives lost all their political funding.

Twitter had to raise the character limit, because their piggy bank who also owned a lot of the media, is now sleeping on the floor with all his money confiscated.

Then magically, after the funds disappear, something happens to Epstein house? that is odd.