You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] KosherHiveKicker [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I have about the same credentials as some of the people (claim to) have in that video and I'm not sure they really earned it

Sure thing.... "Internet Expert Structural Engineer"

Would you care to refute the actual physics involved, or are you going to limit yourself to mocking "The Tower of Snow"?

1
-1

[–] 10467061? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a49/1227842/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/sep/05/9-11-conspiracy-theories-debunked

http://www.news.com.au/world/six-really-stupid-911-conspiracies-debunked-in-about-six-seconds/news-story/a59cdac9a894a786544f96b8b7893cee

I'm as qualified as the guy claiming he had a masters in math therefor staring at the WTC he can tell how it would collapse. I have a math degree and I am calling him an idiot. Please provide me a list of names in this video and a list of their credentials that show they are qualified to make these claims. Because they either aren't or they are being taken out of context.

1
-1

[–] KosherHiveKicker [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Here is a Full Documentary, and over 1500 Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth - ( all information you requested regarding names, credentials, and qualifications are here )

Now please explain how the collapses of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7. Each defied basic physics via their free fall speed collapses. Specifically explain the acceleration of their free-fall without resistance. Each of these buildings had healthy support structure below and still fell at speeds that require no resistance below them.

Where did the energy needed come from to fall at WTC 1 (11 seconds), WTC 2 (9 seconds), and WTC 7 (7 seconds).