You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

18
-16

[–] muricasnexttopautist 18 points -16 points (+2|-18) ago 

I,don't care about the statues, but one thing I would like to point out is that they are monuments to the losing side. Where do we see monuments erected to the losers of wars? Is that normal?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

4
-4

[–] muricasnexttopautist 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

Yeah, ok, but still. You wont see monuments built to any other rebel group that loses in any other country. Imagine monuments being built to ISIS generals, who were just "brave Iraqis". Sure we are all one nation, that's why we killed each other in a war? I dont buy it, they were rebels who lost. Put up a monument to whatever you want, but be honest.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] muricasnexttopautist 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Not in Vietnam.

0
2

[–] Cheesebooger 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That war isn't over yet. That was just a little battle. Had the queens army not helped the yankeetards the south would've steamrolled them pussies

0
0

[–] auto_turret ago 

The South didn't stand a chance with hardly any infrastructure and less than half of the total population, even without any outside influences. Doesn't make them any less noble for giving it an honest try.

0
1

[–] KingoftheMolePeople 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If the losing side wants to put up memorials to their loss why should I care?

1
-1

[–] muricasnexttopautist 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Its the winning sides job to make sure the loser is aware of the boot on their neck.