You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

there's two sides to this, only one is presenting evidence for their claims (video evidence at that). Who do you think any reasonable person will side with?

1
-1

[–] 9661489? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

The side "presenting evidence" is being doubted by the people citing his evidence. I think the people can smell that bullshit from a mile away. The guy with "evidence" is known to selectively edit videos and has been sued successfully for doing so. He was found to edit videos in a criminal manner. He is not reasonably credible.

0
1

[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

all evidence should meet some doubt that's just basic skepticism. and the rest of that is allegations and slander a longer version of this video is on his website