You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
-4

[–] 9659357? 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

In a non-refundable example of hypocrisy you completely ignore the nuance I put into my words when I said "moving towards" and you read that I said we were "in" an authoritarian plutocracy.

You, without any nuance, categorize people you disagree with as a monolith. You also, devoid of nuance, call my views bullshit and mindless with no explanation or reason. Do you not understand the words you use?

My objections are not mindless. The president should be held to a standard of integrity and Trump is failing. He's barely or not at all above criminality, much less integrity. He's destroying the credibility of the presidency.

0
2

[–] Tsuishika 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I put into my words when I said "moving towards" and you read that I said we were "in" an authoritarian plutocracy.

Explain how we are moving towards the authoritarian plutocracy, you melodramatic faggot. It doesn't matter whether I read it as 'we were' or 'we are moving towards', fucking explain how we are moving towards north korean dictatorship, you smartass. Also nuance is same meaning as subtle as I meant you should be opposing the presidency with more discretion. I'm right when you liberal fags keep misusing the words in loose manner by exaggerating the fuck out of everything, that's when the words lose their original meaning.

My objections are not mindless. The president should be held to a standard of integrity and Trump is failing. He's barely or not at all above criminality, much less integrity. He's destroying the credibility of the presidency.

When you don't even explain why Trump is failing, your words don't mean a goddamn squat.

He's destroying the credibility of the presidency.

Bill Clinton already did, you dumbfuck with short term memory, I might even add Richard Nixon. That's why we have wikipedia for ignorant twats to read up on history.

1
-1

[–] 9661475? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Are you upset that you're just as bad at this as you say I am? You're mad that you got called out for the same bullshit that you discredit others for? It's not melodramatic to want to clarify the difference between living in and moving towards a massive regime change. The fact that the president is gaslighting the nation by constantly lying about his election, inauguration, and previous statements is a sign of oncoming authoritarian tendencies. So is attacking the press and doing so directly. He also has tried to discredit courts and judges who rule against him. He, on the campaign trail, called for his opponents to be jailed without any trial or evidence in court that she should be.

Sure, Nixon and Clinton degraded the office, but not because they can't read or form coherent sentences. Nixon killed thousands of people by extending a war and Clinton got some head, but they were civic minded men who acted with restraint when it came to the important pieces of running a country. They acted like a president, not a child.