You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Tsuishika 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If it was every now and then, I wouldn't mind but this has been constant stream of bullshit coming from fags like you. When you are gonna oppose something, don't do it mindlessly. Do it with some nuance, would you?

And I'm curious to hear what makes you think you are in authoritarian plutocracy?

that doesn't change the fact that our democracy is moving towards an authoritarian plutocracy.

Problem with liberals is that they use words unsparingly without any consideration, they destroy the full intent of the words and make them meaningless.

4
-4

[–] 9659357? 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

In a non-refundable example of hypocrisy you completely ignore the nuance I put into my words when I said "moving towards" and you read that I said we were "in" an authoritarian plutocracy.

You, without any nuance, categorize people you disagree with as a monolith. You also, devoid of nuance, call my views bullshit and mindless with no explanation or reason. Do you not understand the words you use?

My objections are not mindless. The president should be held to a standard of integrity and Trump is failing. He's barely or not at all above criminality, much less integrity. He's destroying the credibility of the presidency.

0
2

[–] Tsuishika 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I put into my words when I said "moving towards" and you read that I said we were "in" an authoritarian plutocracy.

Explain how we are moving towards the authoritarian plutocracy, you melodramatic faggot. It doesn't matter whether I read it as 'we were' or 'we are moving towards', fucking explain how we are moving towards north korean dictatorship, you smartass. Also nuance is same meaning as subtle as I meant you should be opposing the presidency with more discretion. I'm right when you liberal fags keep misusing the words in loose manner by exaggerating the fuck out of everything, that's when the words lose their original meaning.

My objections are not mindless. The president should be held to a standard of integrity and Trump is failing. He's barely or not at all above criminality, much less integrity. He's destroying the credibility of the presidency.

When you don't even explain why Trump is failing, your words don't mean a goddamn squat.

He's destroying the credibility of the presidency.

Bill Clinton already did, you dumbfuck with short term memory, I might even add Richard Nixon. That's why we have wikipedia for ignorant twats to read up on history.