This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ZYX321 ago
The ban may not be unconstitutional, but it being passed as an executive order might be. There may be other ways to get it done.
[–] aria_taint 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
You're completely wrong. The Constitution gives the president that right under 8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens. It's activist judges that are aligned as basically hating Trump and not following the law but defining the law in there own way and not as it's written.
[–] ZYX321 ago (edited ago)
I'm not saying it is. I'm saying it might be, as defined by the supreme court. If they strike it down, it might not be the law itself, just how it became law.
Their motivations aside.
Edit: I looked at the code you mentioned... It's huge. Is there a specific thing in there?
Edit 2:
Interesting... Now I am invested and will be curious to hear their opinions... The especially interesting part is that it says when "the President finds" that given immigrants are bad. Not that they have to be demonstrably bad. But the "President finds".