You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] aria_taint 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

This is the same SCJ that contorted the law to favor the Obamacare mandate. He will contort what president Trump wants and rule the travel ban is unconstitutional just watch.

0
0

[–] ZYX321 ago 

The ban may not be unconstitutional, but it being passed as an executive order might be. There may be other ways to get it done.

0
1

[–] aria_taint 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You're completely wrong. The Constitution gives the president that right under 8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens. It's activist judges that are aligned as basically hating Trump and not following the law but defining the law in there own way and not as it's written.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] aria_taint ago 

A second argument is noting more than "we don't like the first decision do it over until we like it".