1
8

[–] raw 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago  (edited ago)

  1. Free speech and privacy. No censorship. One exception - kiddie porn.

  2. Free market. No conglomerate allowed. Closed door meeting to fix prices punishable with life imprisonment.

  3. Right to bear arms and it's use to be encouraged if situation demands.

0
0

[–] Monsantos_Schlong 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

So you'll allow beastiality? That's nasty

0
2

[–] raw 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Stopping bestiality, we will start entering into a gray. Then the demand will grow to regulate marijuana. Then the demand will grow to regulate guns. And before you know there will be regulations everywhere.

I wanted a government to be exclusive so as to ensure everyone's freedom without getting into personal life on anyone. Therefore no censorship about anything. But some people with mental disorder will go after kiddie porn and I can't allow that. That's why I chose that one restriction. Instead, the govt can offer the treatment of these people.

1
7

[–] Goathammer 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

  1. Arm everyone
  2. Be excellent to each other
  3. No fat chicks

0
2

[–] shitgoose 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You had 3 options and one was a quote from Bill and Ted?!?!

Well sir, you have earned my vote today!

0
0

[–] Plant_Boy 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I guffawed.

4
6

[–] JoeMontana 4 points 6 points (+10|-4) ago 

Whites only.

Towns can't be bigger than 20.000 people.

No satanists. That includes jews, muslims and atheists. Punishable by death.

0
1

[–] raw 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

There are conservative atheists.

0
1

[–] JoeMontana 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I don't care. If you don't believe in God, you don't get to be in my country.

0
1

[–] VicariousJambi 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Well, one things for sure. It'd be a fun time putting these laws into action for the first time.

0
1

[–] JoeMontana 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I'd be having a killing of a time.

0
0

[–] oddjob 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

So what happens when a town is at 20k and someone has a baby? Is the baby or family expelled or do you go kill an old person?

0
1

[–] JoeMontana 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You start planning for a new town when one reaches 14.000.

0
6

[–] Skyrock 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

California

  • take up all federal debt
  • declare independence
  • build impassable border wall to USA

That would of course ruin my country, but I think afterwards I would get a free beer from strangers in each and every red state I visit.

0
1

[–] matthew-- [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

What about all the Californians that have already left California and are spreading to other states?

You can cut off one part of the cancer, but if it's already infected other parts of the body, it's just going to come back.

Apart from that, I like your plan.

1
4

[–] AlterNut 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

  1. The courts, legislature and executive branch will be replaced each eight years by a random selection of citizens with IQs over 120.

  2. Citizens have the rights of free speech, due process, ownership of weapons, liberty, land ownership, self defense and speedy trial by jury.

  3. The government shall not tax citizens more than 20% or spend more than 100% of tax revenue.

0
4

[–] Skyrock 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The government shall not tax citizens more than 20% or spend more than 100% of tax revenue.

That would over time accumulate into a treasury that can't be legally spent. Would the left-over be used as a refund to tax payers after each fiscal year has been closed, or would it stay there as an emergency fund?

0
2

[–] matthew-- [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Jews have higher IQ in general. You'd get a disproportional amount of ((them)) in power. Also very open to abuse.

0
6

[–] gazillions 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I think the jews got into the data source with a big eraser. They've manipulated every historical event why not that?

1
2

[–] Troll 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

No they don't. They can simply afford better education, IQ has jack shit to do with it.

0
3

[–] Monsantos_Schlong 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Iceland. 1. Constitutional carry 2. Government jobs receive national median salary 3. All government and other research must be available to public eye.

0
2

[–] matthew-- [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Iceland...

Sorry mate you must be at least 1 million µm tall to go on this ride people strong to qualify as a country, please try again.

In all honesty, I have no idea what the situation in Iceland is, everyone says it's a socialist utopia.

0
0

[–] Monsantos_Schlong 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I'm not too sure myself. I just chose it because it's a beautiful country and Vikings, so why not.

0
2

[–] Gargilius 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Any place really:

  • anyone is given the right to kill one and only one person on their life time, at any time. for any reason, by any means deemed necessary, without consequence; of course, exceeding this one time free murder card / allowance is punishable by death / some very awful punishment (legit self defense doesn't count against said allowance of course);

  • your privacy in general, and whether or not any one person has used or not this one time free murder allowance in particular, is guaranteed and protected and inviolable;

  • every one is required to carry a lethal weapon of his / her choice, no limitation, but one has to demonstrate mastery in the use of said weapon (with regular training and evaluation, no kidding);

...no other law necessary IMHO.

ps as correctly pointed out, the one free murder allowance cannot be transferable (also, it is not required to use it during your life time). Also, implementation details might be tricky.

0
2

[–] tcp 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

All you called for was a more-paranoid, more wild society. It doesn't really fix things in society.

We already are supposed to have the right to bear arms in the US, and any type of training you enforce is really just a call for government interference. You can't test how someone reacts to a bad situation. It's really just an uncontrolled, incomplete experiment to force even the unfit to take up the responsibility of firearm usage.

We are supposed to have privacy already. Again, it's a call for more government when the only people that can truly protect their privacy are the ones that are careful with preserving it for themselves. Government enforcing this and going after data miners doesn't seem to accomplish anything.

Free murder will just make people paranoid. Innocent people will be killed by idiots. Making enemies is easy when you are an accomplished person. People will have to watch their back at all times, and will be ready to kill strangers in situations where there is no time to think. Due to these problems, people undertaking legal murder would definitely have to wear orange hunting gear, and should be required to declare themselves open season for anyone that thinks they are the target. Ultimately, if someone is smart and careful enough, they can get away with murder. So, this is really nothing new. It sounds like legal jihad if anything.

0
1

[–] matthew-- [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Now this is a fucking interesting one.

I see at least one flaw though. If you ever have a revolution, or a violent ideology/cult. And they reach a significant proportion. There is a huge risk of them using their numbers to simply legally kill whoever is in charge. Your citizens could try to kill them, but it's harder to kill an idea than a person.

Eventually the populace with have a choice to either risk taking a position in the army or government or law enforcement because the last 10 have been legally executed without fail.

A country without a leader would fall very quickly. Unless you could establish some way for the leader to be safe or protected from law1, I don't think it would work at all.

0
0

[–] Skyrock 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

anyone is given the right to kill one and only person on their life time, at any time. for any reason, by any means deemed necessary, without consequence; of course, exceeding this one time free murder card / allowance is punishable by death / some very awful punishment (legit self defense doesn't count against said allowance of course);

What would you do about some sort of "emmission trade" where a rich guy goes around buying off poor people's murder allowances to go on a killing spree? Acceptable free market, or unacceptable undermining of the intent of that law?

0
0

[–] Gargilius 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

...good point, the allowance must be non-transferable for this idea to work like I imagine. Enforcement is going to be tricky, it somehow needs to be flawless, nobody can possibly get away with breaking the law (imagine some kind of high tech automated trusted total surveillance / enforcement system). I also expect some initial chaos before things settle into a stable state. A lot of dumb people are going to die initially, but you'll end up with a very very polite and peaceful society eventually.

0
1

[–] lettersofmarque 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

  1. No government hand outs, ever.
  2. Exile to Alaska instead of prison
  3. Only taxpayers may vote

0
1

[–] Skyrock 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

What have the poor Alaskans ever done to you?

0
0

[–] lettersofmarque 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The Alaskans can handle them. They will teach them how to behave.

0
0

[–] 10000-20000 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

exile to alaska? i wish that would happen to me

0
2

[–] Alwaysmakingprogress 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Greyhound leaves daily!

load more comments ▼ (13 remaining)