1
40

[–] thedreammanalishi 1 points 40 points (+41|-1) ago 

soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=8a5bd4fb-2687-4cdf-9906-0a65f4d8d52b&filingTypeID=1

That is proof John Podesta works for Russia. It is an LD 1 disclosure form.

Podesta also received 100,000 shares from Joule, over 4 years.

wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4635

(Here is Podesta's tax attorney: http://www.steptoe.com/professionals-John_Cobb.html))

joule-unlimited.com/about/board

That is the board at Joule. All Russian CEOs, including Sberbank, Troika Dialog, Rusnano and Rosatom.

They all worked together to make the Uranium One deal happen.

But, it gets worse.

youtube.com/watch?v=3eO8ZHfV4fk

Chaika is exposed in this documentary that is banned in Russia.

Yuri Chaika was in put in power by Medvedev, but he indicates to an intelligence analyst that Sergei Ivanov is calling the shots.

wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/54/5410884_re-insight-russia-head-of-major-criminal-group-arrested.html

Chaika said he has already been under a lot of heat because of the Politkovskaya arrests. He said that he would rather not tell me about the "Chechen mastermind" they arrested. I asked if this was because he was not really a mastermind and Chaika said that "many things needed to be tied up as we head into this election and the end of Putin's reign." [I know this is strange, but he kept saying things like, "Ivanov needs to have control over the situation he's about to enter into.... Ivanov is known for his distance from such situations, so they need to be wrapped up."]

What is crazy, is that even organized crime won't go near energy assets, which is a playground that Podesta, Hillary and the DNC have no problem playing in. That is a really interesting point... that they scare the Russian mob.

Either way, these people at the top of Russian politics are very often cooperating with our own intelligence assets. Here is a list:

docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OVvquE_0SIXo1NLgJmFr7gjUbDFNjUG2YzdHZxPFyzU/edit?usp=sharing

During the course of the Uranium One scandal, Gazprom was also acquiring extraction rights and expanding with more locations and resources.

wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/55/5500400_re-t-weekly-next-week-.html

the company builds pipelines around the world and Gazprom wanted the the company, so the owner of the company ended up with his shoulders broken and stuffed into a pipeline. Then they turned on the nat gas and he suffocated while his limbs flew off in the 50 mph nat gas flow.....

The Russians seem pretty great at compartmentalizing, but all these paths seem to course through Dmitry Medvedev.

I am confident that a decent group of investigators can tie all this up, now that the Chaika scandal has been exposed. It is just a matter of tracing the web.

Meanwhile, the news in the US doesn't actually educate people on how Russian corruption works because that would elucidate ties to our own government.

0
16

[–] Le_Squish 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Shills are avoiding your comment like the plague.

26
-26

0
13

[–] cynicaloldfart 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)

And THAT is what EVIDENCE IS, Shariablue!! Please post your EVIDENCE now.

0
8

[–] Not_A_Large_Duck 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Fucking saving this. I've been looking for a sourced consolidated argument..

0
20

[–] LostEscapeArtist 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Normally when an investigation continues to show no evidence for an assertion the investigation is ended, and only opened back up again if evidence appears at a later date. In this case they just keep digging because they have a preconceived notion that the assertion of 'collusion' must be true regardless of lacking evidence.

0
4

[–] PewterKey 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

To play devil's advocate. Say they know it is true, it could be a case of parallel construction. But they are struggling to not expose other members of the group. Because if it was something like Podesta that introduced Trump to a key Russian official, it would make them need to assassinate a inner member with lot's of leverage.

0
2

[–] Martel-Sobieski 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

They are trying to dig up any dirt they can to be used as control blackmail. If they had actual collusion info it would've come out long ago. Instead they want to drag their feet, try and delegitimize the president, and try to get as much blackmail as they can on him and people inside his staff

It's the deep States way of operating

0
0

[–] Bigz_Sarducci 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

President Trump needs to fleece out his cabinet of former Obama snitches. I am afraid he has deep state operatives in his midst....

0
1

[–] belrial 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The lack of evidence then becomes "evidence" that they are even more clever in hiding the conspiracy.

0
3

[–] Rommel79 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I heard this from several people. I asked my mother in law if she honestly believes that the guy who can't stay off of Twitter and supposedly runs his mouth so much he has leaked state secrets could honestly create and maintain an undetectable conspiracy to take over the US. She said that was a good point, but she still thinks it might have happened.

22
-21

1
12

[–] Spaceballs-1 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

Democrats still rooting around in the shit pile convinced that there's a pony in there.

0
0

[–] Bigz_Sarducci 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That's one brown pony.

0
7

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Doesn't matter, even smart people that only consume mainstream media are fully convinced at this point that there are mountains of evidence, and are even offended when you suggest otherwise. I've even heard Obama's Russian diplomat expulsion stunt listed as evidence of Trump's collusion. How? I don't know, but the fact that a thing happened is apparently evidence of Russia getting Trump elected. And if you ask these people how Russia could've possibly written Hillary's emails, you just get told that her emails don't matter. But if her emails don't matter, then how did Russia's purported hacking influence the election? It's just desperate flailing.

0
4

[–] flapjack_charlie 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

If you're smart you don't only consume main stream media.

0
0

[–] Martel-Sobieski 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Nah. Get out of the city. Most people have simply shut down and stopped believing anything

Harvard study: 87% of republicans 65% of independents and 53% of democrats believe the media regularly lies. Highest they've ever measured

0
6

[–] 9377872? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

What if the leaks are intentional and part of a grand strategy to undermine the media?

Seems like that's going to be the end result if Trump is cleared.

0
3

[–] the_sharpest_knife 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Ive heard this suggested before. That would be the most hilarious scenario.

0
1

[–] Martel-Sobieski 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

That's what I'd do. No matter what you do it's going to be twisted as a negative by the lugenpresse. So simply use that to your advantage and let them make themselves irrelevant by simply making them report so many lies no one believes them anymore. Then their impact is neutered

0
5

[–] heretolearn 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

imagine if they put this much effort into Seth Rich's murder, we might get somewhere.

2
4

[–] lorlipone 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

And people wonder why I laugh at them when they say "But he's under investigation Blahblahblah Russia. . ."

load more comments ▼ (21 remaining)