You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] Ywis 0 points 53 points (+53|-0) ago 

I've called this before and I'm saying it again. The Clinton Foundation is buying PR for Chelsea because she's going to run in 2018.

Since the minute Hillary was out of the 2016 race Chelsea has been getting press for no reason.

She has a PR company ramping up her public image for a campaign she hasn't announced yet.


[–] 8507682? 3 points 16 points (+19|-3) ago  (edited ago)

There's one major problem:

  • She is god-awful ugly.

The spin doctors at the DNC can figure out how to fabricate the appearance of her political ideology as being in line with the party's base,but there's only so much they can do to make her look like a human.


[–] bloodguard 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

She's also comes off as dumb as a rock when she doesn't have a script in front of her. Not that it really makes any difference. People really won't be voting for her. They'll be voting for the agenda and the people that are working her strings.


[–] CRKT_M16Z 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

She's less ugly than Bill's wife and Bill's wife managed to make it all the way to the presidential election.


[–] Mr_Quagmire 8 points 7 points (+15|-8) ago  (edited ago)

Oh please, she isn't that bad looking. And even if she was, so what?

How about some actual reasons to dislike her instead of regurgitating this sophomoric theme every time her name is mentioned?

edit: just for the record, I 100% do not support her. I'd just rather have some intelligent discussion around her demerits instead of "hurr durr she looks like a horsey!!!!"


[–] Ywis 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

You never heard the phrase politics is Hollywood for ugly people? If Nancy Pelosi and Donna Brazil can be in politics while being that fugly Chelsea will make it.


[–] DivisionX 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Just look how ugly he is. He's probably their most expensive tranny. You know, besides me.